Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree that your beliefs should come from within when you are older, but when children go to secondary school at 11, their parents are ultimately responsible for making the decision on what they perceive to be the most suitable and best education for them.


Many parents feel very differently about the schools they choose, and choose them for a wide range of reasons. In my case, my daughter had a large say in the secondary school she went to, but the final decision was ours as her parents. Fortunately we agreed with her choice of school so there were no arguments, but there were certain schools I would not have let her go to under any circumstances, and if she had decided that she wanted to follow a particular faith at 11 and go to a faith school, then I'm afraid I wouldn't have agreed to it. When she made the decision about her sixth form education, I felt that she was old enough to make up her own mind and would have given my approval to wherever she had wanted to go.

Few rational people would disavow people the right to believe what they choose, so long as that doesn't involve imposing the consequences of that on others who don't share those beliefs.


Clearly the indoctrination of children doesn't meet those criteria.

Not at all old chap, leave the little fellows to make their own mind up when they're old enough to do so.


Besides 'indoctrinate... a secular belief system' is an oxymoron, there isn't a 'secular' doctrine. Secular is defined by not being of a particular religion - or not of a belief system.


Hence you can't 'indoctrinate' people to be secular, you can only have an absence of religion.

Growlybear Wrote:


I would NEVER be

> so offensive as to challenge the religious views

> of anyone,




I was just wondering why we would not want to challenge religious views as we would challenge any other kind of views? I'm not wishing to be argumentative, I am genuinely interested.

toast Wrote:I must be the only person i know not to have an axe to gring against religion. Bit jealous of the extra choices of schools but thats my bad. Without having had a religious upbringing myself i like the idea of faith, belief etc. Why the bile?


A few punters seem to read The God Delusion and become as rabid as the most extreme religious types.


I went to a school run by catholic priests. It was alright. No apparent psychological damage.

  • 3 weeks later...

St Michael's Bermondsey (mixed)

St Francesca Cabrini Primary, Forest Hill Rd, is a feeder school to this.


Sacred Heart,Camberwell (mixed)


St Thomas the Apostle, Hollydale Rd, Nunhead (boys)


Notre Dame (E and Castle)girls


girls from the area also go to St Ursula's Greenwich, Coloma Convent in Shirley and St Philomena's, Carshalton.


boys also go to John Fisher, Purley and London Oratory.


mixed: Bonus Pastor, Downham, near Catford


both St Francesca Cabrini and William of York Primaries are feeder schools to John Fisher.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...