Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Here's an update from today's Mayor's Question Time at City Hall.


Boris Johnson publically agreed to meet a delegation from the SLL campaign at City Hall, and then join the delagation in a meeting with the Department for Transport, should Lord Adonis agree to meet them. Quote: "I will receive a delegation, and lead it. We will muster in City Hall and then we will go together".


He also 'agreed in principle' to the retention of the South London Line service. He 'would not want to see any reduction for financial reasons'. He was under the impression that due to works at London Bridge the service would be unable to continue for logistical reasons. This is despite Network Rail telling us the other week that it was possible to keep the service, but that they deemed the ELLx2 as more important. It seems as though Boris had been briefed by Network Rail it was not possible (indeed, Boris said it was news to him that it was in fact). He then seemed to imply after further questioning that maybe it was a funding issue after all (while reading from briefing notes), and appeared thrown by the facts.


It's great that he's agreed to meet a deputation as now the facts can be made clear to him in person. Once he knows the facts, it's crucial that as many people attend People's Question Time in Brixton as possible so he knows the strength of feeling in South London over this issue. If we can convince him of the logic and get him to argue in our favour, then a meeting with Lord Adonis could be the turning point for the campaign.


Good stuff.


Thanks,

Laurie



www.laurieeggleston.org

twitter.com/Laurie1984

Just shows that there IS a real job to do to get a message across to the Mayor about the key role that the South London Line plays in the transport infrastructure of inner south London. So it?s important to book your tickets for his appearance in Brixton on 9 November (details below). When EDF is back from holiday you might find all the places gone. This could be some really interesting and important democratic theatre that evening.


There are several different strands to the campaign with ALL the elected reps playing valuable roles, whatever their party, as South Londoners first in this case - in spite of some of our local Forumites perhaps not seeing the wood for the trees, and raising objections to the campaign. But this is often on the mistaken idea that the campaign is opposed to the ELLX, and that the reconstruction work at London Bridge inevitably rules out the SLL continuing there. Neither of those things are 100% true. The campaign is an endeavour to get the whole thing reviewed properly giving proper weight for the FIRST time to the need to plan for proper integration in south London?s overground rail services.


Mayor's Question time - Monday 9th November 7pm - 9pm Apply for tickets to this next Mayor's Question Time in Brixton Academy, south London. Let's have so many rail users there that he has to hear us. TO APPLY: email - [email protected] including your name, address, postcode, daytime phone number and the number of tickets you require (max 6 per application) OR call 020 7983 4762. For background see http://www.southwarkrailusers.net

Hope you have a good hols EDF administrators... We will be even more in the thick of this debate when you return!

Yes indeed well done! i think now is the time to really do something about this while we still can, people will miss this service when its gone, and will complain and kick them self's for not taking any action.


If i get any tickets, i'm certainly going along.

  • 4 weeks later...

Maybe at last there'll be some sanity to the entire debate.


I trust that the 'delegation' will act rationally and listen to both sides of the story. At the moment the highly polarised attitude smacks of no realistic solution.


And I also trust that no idiot will suggest that I must work for a rail company just for making this observation.

I like it! The old 'ask the same question to different people then embarrass each of them with the fact that they are obviously lying' tactic. The best known device to avoid the 'fob-off'.


SLL Campaign seems to be achieving really impressive momentum. I'm always a bit sceptical about how much home-spun single issue campaigns can achieve (look what 1 million people marching against the Iraq war managed) but it seems like you are doing really well. Hopefully the momentum will continue gathering pace and you achieve what you are aiming to achieve.


One in the eye for the service-cutters!

I like it! The old 'ask the same question to different people then embarrass each of them with the fact that they are obviously lying' tactic. The best known device to avoid the 'fob-off'.


SLL Campaign seems to be achieving really impressive momentum. I'm always a bit sceptical about how much home-spun single issue campaigns can achieve (look what 1 million people marching against the Iraq war managed) but it seems like you are doing really well. Hopefully the momentum will continue gathering pace and you achieve what you are aiming to achieve.


One in the eye for the service-cutters!

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SLL Campaign seems to be achieving really

> impressive momentum. I'm always a bit sceptical

> about how much home-spun single issue campaigns

> can achieve (look what 1 million people marching

> against the Iraq war managed) but it seems like

> you are doing really well. Hopefully the momentum

> will continue gathering pace and you achieve what

> you are aiming to achieve. > One in the eye for the service-cutters!


Thanks from the Campaign for this appreciation. One of the excellent achievements has been the coming together of all 4 main parties to be part of the broad Campaign coaliton. What we aim for is for the current review of services to be as thorough as it needs to be. We have made huge progress in getting not only the services to Victoria reviewed but also now the latest news that they are definitely reviewing the issues at London Bridge see http://www.bellenden.net/srug/news/success-%E2%80%93-tfl-review-cover-london-bridge A summary of achievements so far can be found on the Southwark Rail Users' Group webpage at: http://www.bellenden.net/rail-cuts#news

Gimme Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SLL Campaign seems to be achieving really

> impressive momentum. I'm always a bit sceptical

> about how much home-spun single issue campaigns

> can achieve (look what 1 million people marching

> against the Iraq war managed) but it seems like

> you are doing really well. Hopefully the momentum

> will continue gathering pace and you achieve what

> you are aiming to achieve. > One in the eye for the service-cutters!


Thanks from the Campaign for this appreciation. One of the excellent achievements has been the coming together of all 4 main parties to be part of the broad Campaign coaliton. What we aim for is for the current review of services to be as thorough as it needs to be. We have made huge progress in getting not only the services to Victoria reviewed but also now the latest news that they are definitely reviewing the issues at London Bridge see http://www.bellenden.net/srug/news/success-%E2%80%93-tfl-review-cover-london-bridge A summary of achievements so far can be found on the Southwark Rail Users' Group webpage at: http://www.bellenden.net/rail-cuts#news

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And Boris was on telly last night bigging it up.



Hi PeckhamRose - I didn't see this. Can you say what the impression would be for the viewer what the issue was and what had or not been achieved by the Boris intervention? It would be helpful to know how it is coming across. At least, we have now broken through the local ghetto and made it onto the London stage. That is a big step forward.

Hi LibraCarr - I didn't see the Metro piece so can't vouch for its accuracy. But yes there was a decision to terminate the SLL and that is what the campaign is trying to reverse. There are two ends to the SLL with different issues to be overcome:

* the decision that we didn't need a direct service to Victoria in the evenings and on Sundays and wouldn't be provided with one. That has been conceded, and they are looking to see how that could be provided. But the Mayor and the Minister keep battling in public about who should pay for whatever they can devise.

* the decison that SLL can't have any of the terminating platform space at London Bridge. We now have won a commitment that this will also be reviewed, though no guarantee of success yet on that one. All is still to play for.

So now we have both ends of the SLL in the review which was essential if we are to make any headway in getting the whole link restored. Hope that is clearer than mud. The summary of the campaign which also might help is on the http://www.southwarkrailusers.net pages at http://www.bellenden.net/rail-cuts



LibraCarr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi,

>

> I read a article in the Metro newspaper (on the

> transport page) on Monday stating quite clearly

> that the service was going to be terminated.

> I am a little confused, have the Metro

> journalist's got it wrong?

> Kind regards,

> Libra Carr.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • She also suggested that the 2017 Manchester terror attack (perpetrated by an Islamist extremist) was due to "divisiveness" and tried to pin the blame on the far right. Grim, really. 
    • Thankfully, it seems that yesterday's "Red vs Blue" school wars thing has turned out to be a hoax/ nonsense/ whatever. (See link below if you managed to avoid this stuff). In years to come, we might found out who - or which countries - has an interest in testing what happens when you post socially disruptive content online about fake events... In the meantime, thank you to our local teachers and other school workers, police community support officers and police officers. My commute happens to take me past a bunch of schools at dropoff/pickup times, and I noticed a much greater and more visible presence on streets outside/near schools than normal. Annoying as it must have been to be distracted from other important duties, I really value and appreciate them looking out for the kids. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/school-wars-trend-red-blue-london-police-latest-142328025.html https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/jan/01/birmingham-new-year-fireworks-display-centenary-square-police  
    • Hi Eleanor, I run the Just Dance Fit classes mentioned above. It would be lovely to have you there. I’m at the dance studio at Harris Girls’ Academy on Homestall Road throughout the year every Monday, Wednesday and Sunday: Mondays 6:30-7:30pm - Just Dance Fit Mondays 7:30-8:30pm - Flowetic Wednesdays 6:30-7:30pm - Flowetic Sundays 10:30-11:30am - Flowetic Lots of information and booking via the website: www.justdanceuk.com but if you have any questions don’t hesitate to drop me a line at 07522 231 446 or [email protected]. Hope this helps! Fiona =)
    • a) Because they published a leaflet in Urdu promising to give "Muslims a strong voice". This is reprehensible - just as a party that promised to give Protestants or Jews or Buddhists alone "a strong voice" would be acting in a sectarian manner. Parties - especially socialist ones like the English & Welsh Greens are now - should not be assymetrically promoting the interests of one religious group. b) Because they published a video in Urdu and Bangla criticising Kier Starmer for meeting Narendra Modi, when Modi has nothing to do with the issues discussed. Modi is a Hindu nationalist bigot - but in this context, the Greens are just shitstirring existing tensions between British Hindus and British Muslims for the purpose of trying to win Muslim votes - see the first point. FWIW I don't have any problem with parties communicating with the electorate in languages other than English (from Irish to Polish to Malayalam). What is very suspicious is when parties pump out sectarian messages only in one language... When Mamdani ran for Mayor of NYC (and won) he released plenty of campaign videos in multiple languages - but always with English subtitles too. There was never a suggestion he was sending different, sectarian messages to different groups.     https://uk.news.yahoo.com/why-greens-made-advert-urdu-164616073.html https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/uk-green-party-accused-of-sectarianism-after-releasing-videos-in-urdu-and-bangla-featuring-pm-modi-and-gaza/articleshow/128826689.cms  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...