Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello there:)

I've not heard of the 'Eco-nappy' brand [is it a disposable or reusable?] but I do use lots of different brands of washable nappies and have found them really good value for money and alot of fun collecting and using them. My boy seems happy in them too and looks extra cute with a fluffy bum. There's a nappy forum called www.clothnappytree.com where there is SOOO much advice about all the different reusable brands - you may find some info on there about this brand. You can also buy/sell or swap nappies too - which can get quite addictive so watch out.:-$

Hi ThatGuy,


For advice on cloth nappies you can also come to me for advice and demos, the best place to start is to visit www.thenappylady.co.uk where you will find a lot of useful reading.


I see Eco Nappies do both cloth and eco disposables. If you are looking at disposables one thing I will say is that you need to look at the whole footprint from production onwards because from a disposal point of view whether you use mainstream or eco nappies doesn't make much difference if you are going to put them in your dustbin. This is because when disposables get rolled into a ball, tied up in a nappy sack and put into a dustbin, to ultimately go into landfill they are not going to degrade because landfill is managed to avoid precisely that (because of the risk of methane explosion). Liquid waste can drain away, but solid waste sits there, pretty much for ever, and just gets covered over as each cell fills up.


When a pack of eco disposables say they are "80% degradable" they may well be if you live on a farm with a few hundred acres available to manage them and compost them in the right way, but for most of this this isn't an option, and the claim is only possible because 80% of a soiled nappy is urine and faeces.


It makes depressing reading I know. But, from a production point of view Moltex are very good - their factory in Germany has won many awards for their environmental standards, use of recycled products, and recycling etc. Of course, if you are planning to use cloth that is better from an environmental, financial and leak proof (if you get good advice and the right nappy) point of view.....but it really is important, please don't just go and buy a whole set of nappies 'off the peg' before baby is born, it is like trying to buy a car without test driving it first!


Best wishes, Molly


www.thenappylady.co.uk

[email protected]

Laundering services tend to only do their own nappies, doubt you'd get them back safely (they also wash too hot for shaped nappies - heat wrecks elastic and velcro etc)....would suggest you hand swill so they are fairly clean, bundle them up in a towel and go to the local launderette with them and just bung them in towel and all......or bring them around to my place if you like........or smile sweetly at a neighbour.........I had a week without a machine last year when baby was a few months old and managed to alternate between 2 of my neighbours who were both cloth nappy friendly thank goodness!


Drying not a problem if you have radiators and/or an airer.


Hope you get sorted soon.


Molly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...