Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What on earth was the agenda of the filmmakers? Are they trying to tell us that the death penalty is a good thing and we should open the debate again? Is that what it was about?


I thought the opposite, but maybe I'm wrong...


Was difficult viewing, but very well made.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The fact that this being discussed on Forums like

> this up and down the country proves that there is

> strong feeling both for and against the death

> penalty and neither faction will persuade the

> other faction to change their view. I've always

> believed in the death penalty for certain crimes

> and that has never chamged, nor has anybody

> persuaded me that the death penalty is wrong.

_______________________________________________________


Really, I mean really truly



If so why have so many states put it "on hold" ?


It is barbaric, it does not stop crime. So what's the justification then



I'm all ears Atia & Ian & whoever






Well ?




W**F

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on earth was the agenda of the filmmakers?

> Are they trying to tell us that the death penalty

> is a good thing and we should open the debate

> again? Is that what it was about?

>

> I thought the opposite, but maybe I'm wrong...

>

> Was difficult viewing, but very well made.



Yes it was difficult viewing but I didn't think it was well made - I thought that it was scraping the bottom of the barrel for C4. There was no point in the programme that I felt I was being challenged and was being shown things from a different perspective that I didn't necessarily agree with but nevertheless had merit. For me it was as challenging as reading the Daily Mail.

For me, the very best thing about the ED forum (when it's on top form) is that there are people who come on here and post things that in a million years I wouldn't agree with but they argue so well that they at least have my ear. For the same reason, it's why those who want to subvert the forum incur my anger. Very sad to see C4 producing drivel like this.

If Capital Punishment was reinstated it would have to be in public, not hidden away in prisons IMHO. Those who support it, or not then know what is happening and the public response. I'm generally against by the way.


and, about C4, as the Guardian says


"A former glam-rock star called, say, Stanley Sparkle, who likes to have sex with children would have fooled nobody, but would have demonstrated a little more humanity. "

JohnL wrote>


"A former glam-rock star called, say, Stanley Sparkle, who likes to have sex with children would have fooled nobody, but would have demonstrated a little more humanity. "


________________________________________________________________________________



First Gary Glitter, now Stanley Sparkle. I mean who next, Danny Dazzle ?


It cant be true, really ?

Though there are certainly horrific cynical

predators, and though it's hard for me to say, glitter seems

to be one of them, plenty of paedophiles see mentally ill, often profoundly damaged as victims of sexual abuse themselves.

Surely to demand death for them is tantamount to euthenasia, what next, cerebral palsy?


Plus the whole 'they'll never do it again' thing, where lines drawn, death by drink driving, drink driving full stop (prevention being better than cure)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
    • Does anybody know why? Trees aren't cut down for no reason. There must have been something wrong with it (I hope that was the reason). A child was recently killed and another one injured when a tree fell in a park (not in this area). It isn't always obvious from the outside when a tree is diseased or whatever, and I imagine the council would give safety considerations priority when deciding what to do, if there was any doubt at all.
    • It looks like they have cut it down completely now 😭
    • Different people will be  involved within Thames Water. The people dealing with the leaks aren't the people encouraging less water usage. How many people have reported the Barry Road leak? By what channels? What response have they had? When we had a leak in our road which meant we had no water, several people reported it, there was good communication with TW, they explained why they couldn't come out immediately (other urgent jobs elsewhere in the area) , kept  in touch with us and fixed the leak within a reasonable timescale (hours). Someone from TW also contacted me later to make sure my water was back. But does Thames Water know about it? They aren't psychic (I presume). If nobody reports it, I also presume they won't even know the leaks are  there, unless they have some kind of central monitoring system which tells them when there are leaks in the system. To make it clear, I am not defending Thames Water as a company, which I think should never have been privatised.  But there are some things they can't be blamed for (old and disintegrating water pipe system in London) and some they can (possibly, lack of sufficient staff to deal with leaks, maybe due to trying to save money to give their shareholders more. But this is just surmise on my part - I know nothing about Thames Water).
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...