Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What on earth was the agenda of the filmmakers? Are they trying to tell us that the death penalty is a good thing and we should open the debate again? Is that what it was about?


I thought the opposite, but maybe I'm wrong...


Was difficult viewing, but very well made.

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The fact that this being discussed on Forums like

> this up and down the country proves that there is

> strong feeling both for and against the death

> penalty and neither faction will persuade the

> other faction to change their view. I've always

> believed in the death penalty for certain crimes

> and that has never chamged, nor has anybody

> persuaded me that the death penalty is wrong.

_______________________________________________________


Really, I mean really truly



If so why have so many states put it "on hold" ?


It is barbaric, it does not stop crime. So what's the justification then



I'm all ears Atia & Ian & whoever






Well ?




W**F

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What on earth was the agenda of the filmmakers?

> Are they trying to tell us that the death penalty

> is a good thing and we should open the debate

> again? Is that what it was about?

>

> I thought the opposite, but maybe I'm wrong...

>

> Was difficult viewing, but very well made.



Yes it was difficult viewing but I didn't think it was well made - I thought that it was scraping the bottom of the barrel for C4. There was no point in the programme that I felt I was being challenged and was being shown things from a different perspective that I didn't necessarily agree with but nevertheless had merit. For me it was as challenging as reading the Daily Mail.

For me, the very best thing about the ED forum (when it's on top form) is that there are people who come on here and post things that in a million years I wouldn't agree with but they argue so well that they at least have my ear. For the same reason, it's why those who want to subvert the forum incur my anger. Very sad to see C4 producing drivel like this.

If Capital Punishment was reinstated it would have to be in public, not hidden away in prisons IMHO. Those who support it, or not then know what is happening and the public response. I'm generally against by the way.


and, about C4, as the Guardian says


"A former glam-rock star called, say, Stanley Sparkle, who likes to have sex with children would have fooled nobody, but would have demonstrated a little more humanity. "

JohnL wrote>


"A former glam-rock star called, say, Stanley Sparkle, who likes to have sex with children would have fooled nobody, but would have demonstrated a little more humanity. "


________________________________________________________________________________



First Gary Glitter, now Stanley Sparkle. I mean who next, Danny Dazzle ?


It cant be true, really ?

Though there are certainly horrific cynical

predators, and though it's hard for me to say, glitter seems

to be one of them, plenty of paedophiles see mentally ill, often profoundly damaged as victims of sexual abuse themselves.

Surely to demand death for them is tantamount to euthenasia, what next, cerebral palsy?


Plus the whole 'they'll never do it again' thing, where lines drawn, death by drink driving, drink driving full stop (prevention being better than cure)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let me rephrase this He does not seem to be personally bothered by the impact he has.  Rather than immune from somebody taking action against him.  Although the bar had to be raised and raised before anyone did anything, and there are still those in his party who think it was wrong to get rid of him. He delivered a poor Brexit so didn't get that right.  He didn't believe in it, in the first place, he was just getting one up on his chum Dave.
    • 1. No he's not, he made a pigs ear of things, his leadership was poor and his behaviour was unbecoming of the highest office in the land.  2. No they don't,  he was a prime buffoon 3. Not a messiah, in no way. He caused great damage to both the Party and Country after three years of differing by May. The only thing he completed was B  r  e  x  i  t.  Are we paying the price. Don't ask me, I was in an induced coma at the time, fighting for my own life.    
    • My comment is trying to not take any political side but rather be objective on what I see, hear and read. If the Government made a positive difference to people's lives, people would be pro this Govt, but sadly the majority don't see an improvement since they have been in Office, but rather the opposite so people's opinions of the Government are poor.  I think if you did a straw poll of users on here, the result for those in favour of the Government is likely to be unfavourable, but I may be totally wrong, quite possible. No one I speak or am in contact with has a single good word to say about the current Administration. In fact the calls for a General Election just become stronger and stronger. 
    • Worth calling ahead as sometimes they can’t accept large donations
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...