Jump to content

Recommended Posts

How is the ranking decided (what major factors hold the most weight)? I find it interesting that France is number 1. I have a lot of French colleagues and they think the NHS is terrible. All of them over the years (an this adds up to about a dozen people) have gone back to Paris to give birth. I always suspected this was just part of the French's general jingoism but perhaps there was some truth to it.

It's not exactly free though. We all pay into it. When making European comparisons, we are not always comparing like for like. Many European countries have aspects to their health services that run like private models. In France for example, you will pay for a GP appointment and then claim the money back if you are eligible to do so. The only areas that we manage like that are prescriptions and dentistry.


The NHS though still remains excellent value for what we spend.


And what dismays me about the pressure for privatisation is that government look to America, when really they should be looking to Europe, where there are plenty of good examples of where changes could be made that don't in reality privatise huge areas of healthcare.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And what dismays me about the pressure for privatisation is that government look to America,

> when really they should be looking to Europe, where there are plenty of good examples of where

> changes could be made that don't in reality privatise huge areas of healthcare.


What makes you think they are looking to America? Or are you equating 'privatised' with the US and then projecting? Germany and Austria are two systems that have a significant private contribution and work very well.

The Swiss system is also a private model in which everyone has compulsory insurance. It is still individual policies that can be supplemented.


Of the fully publicly funded systems, I'm not sure which ones are the best-- ie who gets the most quality of life / extended life for dollar spend. Some analysis by York University to complement NICE cost benefit analysis showed that every circa 20k of expenditure equals one QUALY currently in the NHS.


I'm not sure how other health systems compare.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euro_health_consumer_index


This is an interesting list. Like all lists it can't be perfect but at least it breaks down the components on which the country's are being scored. The UK ranks 14 out of 37 European countries. It mostly loses points for waiting times and to a lesser extent for health outcomes.


Waiting times for non life threatening illnesses in the UK can be quite astonishing. My husband needed knee treatment and the NHS sent him a letter several months after being on the waiting list that stated if they didn't hear from him within two weeks they'd remove him from the waiting list. We were luck we got it in time as we'd been on holiday when it initially arrived. Its one of the ways the NHS tries to reduce its lists. Eventually, we just used my private insurance and paid the deductible.

Government ministers have consulted with American healthcare providers Loz. They published a report via one of their think tanks. I will try and find it.


What I would say is that there is not enough investment in preventative care. Some areas have improved on that front, like cancer, but other areas like mental health and obesity are extremely under resourced. If we want to reduce NHS cost, we could start with the diet of the nation. The long term savings to the NHS would be significant on that front alone.

How can the NHS influence people's diets with more funding. I'm not sure there are a lot of people who are obese because they don't know what is healthy and what is not. Taxing really unhealthy food and subsidizing healthy choices might be the only thing that makes a serious impact on the choices people make.

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Government ministers have consulted with American healthcare providers Loz. They published a report

> via one of their think tanks. I will try and find it.


I'm sure they have, but that doesn't mean we are heading towards a US-style system. The NHS Supply Chain has been run by the German logistics company DHL and NHS Shared Business Services, handling a wide range of back office functions (SBS), is 50% owned by French IT company Sopra Steria. Virgin (UK owner) has show a lot of interest in health provision.

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Very scary times.


Also, I can't believe that despite winning the popular vote, the assigned delegates (those you get from winning a state) and the total delegates (including Super Delegates), Sander won't concede much less congratulate her as is standard practice.


There is something very ugly about it and I strongly suspect would never happen to a male candidate.

Louisa, he has lost the race by every metric. Not conceding is petty, disrespectful, pointless and increases the chance of a Trump victory.



Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good on Bernie Sanders for not conceding yet. He

> is the authentic Democratic candidate this

> electoral season. A principled man.

>

> Louisa.

I was interested to hear that liberally inclined voters in the US view the Clintons much in the same way that liberally inclined voters in the UK view the Blairs - suggesting that voting for Hillary is analogous to voting for Cherie!


really difficult for anyone who would otherwise welcome a woman running for President

LM in any normal circumstances I would say conceding defeat would be the appropriate thing to do, but considering how unpopular Hilary is both inside the Democrat Party and out in the wider US electorate, it is the right thing to do. It's alarming that some working class Democrats are so anti-establishment that they would be prepared to vote Trump rather than Hilary. She's a polarising figure, as much, if not more so than Trump.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I was under the impression that Bill Clinton is

> remembered much more fondly over there than Tony

> Blair is over here...


my impression too - but that's not saying a lot, they seem to have a better tolerance for sleaze over there

I see that a poll of fave un-dead ex presidents over there had Bill neck and neck with Bush Senior

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...