Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This can apply across the board but here are a couple of examples


There is a guy in Forest Hill, you may have seen him walking up/down Dartmouth Road. He obviously works in an office type environment as he is relatively smart in his appearance though his oversized tan car coat disturbs me somewhat. So far so good. It's his hair though that startles me, he has it parted with a fringe however, the rest is long & way past his collar, so basically two hair cuts in one, but both very badly done


I wonder what he sees in the mirror every morning, it's quite bizarre.Maybe he only has a small face mirror, you know the one with a flat & an opposing concave side, thus missing out his hair in the chosen view


Very odd, yet strangely compelling


I do however dig him in a weird way.



The other is much simpler but equally paradoxical and seen on the same piece of road. A man rides a bike from Forest Hill toward Kirkdale, each time I observe him he is smoking a cigarette. Usually with one eye squint where the smoke blows in and smarts it


It is the neutralising of a seemingly healthy pursuit that I like. It's his nonchalance too " Yeah I am smoking & cycling, up yours"


On one side cycling & the other smoking. The yin to the yang


Maybe it's something in the water round there


I like it though




W**F

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/8644-so-wrong-but-so-right/
Share on other sites

This has made me think of two things. Firstly, im sure TLS would have come out with some other great examples of real Characters. Secondly, there is a Transvestite who parades about on Streatham High Street, by the Market in full clobber and make-up without a care in the world. Sometimes he takes it upon himself to act as a kind of 'community warden', telling people off for cycling on the pavement, dropping litter and being anti-social :)

...Firstly, im sure TLS would have come out with some other great examples of real Characters....


Daisy said (tu) (See I can do formatting finally, B))



Cheers me old mucker, unfortunately the good citizens (or should that by City-zens) of the EDF will have no idea that just on their doorstep used to exist a world of characters, yes so much variety, multi-cultural before multi-culture was invented by those who want nothing to do with it, don't make me laugh.


How would the EDF in-crowd react to people like Simple Lenny, who used to ride his bike backwards up East Street wearing a fez and throwing coppers to us kids. Or Big Dora, who owned all the working girls from Elephant to Burgess Park and ran the Inn & Temple from her upstairs bed using a system of ropes and pulleys.


But can you mention that and not expect to get howled down by the oh-so broadminded :)) ignorati on here, then I don't think so Lord Copper. If you want to see real characters now you have to move from Inner London, to London suburbs like Sydney, Cape Town and Bexley Heath. Unfort these sorts of characters aren't the sort of characters that would fit in on the EDF, so they don't exist to some on here. :)-D

Ted Max Wrote:


> Cheers me old mucker, unfortunately the good

> citizens (or should that by City-zens) of the EDF

> will have no idea that just on their doorstep used

> to exist a world of characters, yes so much

> variety, multi-cultural before multi-culture was

> invented by those who want nothing to do with it,

> don't make me laugh.

>

> How would the EDF in-crowd react to people like

> Simple Lenny, who used to ride his bike backwards

> up East Street wearing a fez and throwing coppers

> to us kids. Or Big Dora, who owned all the working

> girls from Elephant to Burgess Park and ran the

> Inn & Temple from her upstairs bed using a system

> of ropes and pulleys.

>

> But can you mention that and not expect to get

> howled down by the oh-so broadminded :)) ignorati

> on here, then I don't think so Lord Copper. If you

> want to see real characters now you have to move

> from Inner London, to London suburbs like Sydney,

> Cape Town and Bexley Heath. Unfort these sorts of

> characters aren't the sort of characters that

> would fit in on the EDF, so they don't exist to

> some on here. :)-D


_________________________________________________________


Ted


You weren't riding a bike up Dartmout Rd whilst smoking a cigarette last Friday were you ?



Could it have been....


W**F

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...