Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The dangerous Barry/ Underhill junction had ?build-outs? (much at the instigation of Mr Barber) in order to make the junction safer to cross for motorists in Underhill Road. These are ?protected? by road hatchings which should place parked vehicles a little away from the junction to improve visibility. However, and on both sides of Barry, I have noticed very large white vans parked up to the build-out and over the road hatchings ? making pulling out of Underhill to cross (particularly travelling south, away from the Whateley end) very hazardous. By the time you have edged out far enough into the road to see past the white vans, traffic is already on you.


I would have thought the parking mavens employed by Southwark could have done something about this, although I note the sweet-heart deals between any and all builders and the council might well exempt them from any requirement to park properly. Actually, having large commercial vehicles parked at junctions obscuring visibility seems almost a requirement locally now ? maybe it?s a new bye-law I?ve missed.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/86564-dangerous-parking-in-barry-road/
Share on other sites

I don't think it's illegal to park on this kind of hatching - it's only there to define the road. This urban style of hatching isn't even in the highway code.


Pulled out of there tonight - it's like having to look around a single storey building while that Enterprise van is there.


I said ages ago, before the expensive build-out was put in, that there should be two cars' length of double-yellows on the right hand sides on that junction, but instead, they went for the expensive option.

It isn't illegal. We don't have the mechanisms to differentiate parking between vans which block sight lines and other vehicles. The good news dramatically were crashes at this junction than the past. Other junctions now need to be addressed before we return to this unless the vans continue - in which case double yellow lines is them out likely result there.

sheff wrote on December 11th As it happens I've just seen someone get hit side on in there car attempting to pull out from that junction.

This lunchtime.


Mr Barber writes on December 12th The good news dramatically were crashes at this junction than the past.


Really?

davidk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This would stop if Southwark made any attempt to

> penalise illegal parking in this area but they are

> clearly not interested.


Davidk, there is a lack of transparency in the way S'wark implement traffic management and then 'police' it. It seems to be the be case that certain developers, and the builders they hire, can park wherever they want, wreaking whatever havoc they choose, with no fear of penalty from S'wark parking. On the other hand, your average, council tax paying resident is treated somewhat differently.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sheff wrote on December 11th As it happens I've

> just seen someone get hit side on in there car

> attempting to pull out from that junction.

> This lunchtime.

>

> Mr Barber writes on December 12th The good news

> dramatically were crashes at this junction than

> the past.

>

> Really?


Ditto.

  • 3 months later...

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It isn't illegal. We don't have the mechanisms to

> differentiate parking between vans which block

> sight lines and other vehicles. The good news

> dramatically were crashes at this junction than

> the past. Other junctions now need to be addressed

> before we return to this unless the vans continue

> - in which case double yellow lines is them out

> likely result there.


The white vans have continued to park on the corner - I have many times both on bicycle and car found it dangerous to cross Barry Rd from Underhill Rd in the direction of Lordship Lane.


The same tall white vans are a problem. If there was ever a case for double yellow lines round the junction this is one of them.. I am amazed there hasn't been an accident yet.


Would be great if you could bring this up at a meeting - especially in the context of the move to paint yellow lines all over the place. Better to zero in on trouble spots than a blanket policy

James Barber Wrote on 12th December 2016:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It isn't illegal. We don't have the mechanisms to

> differentiate parking between vans which block

> sight lines and other vehicles. The good news

> dramatically were crashes at this junction than

> the past. Other junctions now need to be addressed

> before we return to this unless the vans continue

> - in which case double yellow lines is them out

> likely result there.


You do not have to be a traffic expert to conclude just looking at the junction that if there is one place that absolutely cried out for yellow lines it was this junction.


Clearly nothing has been done about it since December 2015 .. and I hope the accident there tonight was not caused by obscured site lines.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...