Jump to content

Recommended Posts

LondonMix Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Are you serious. Nicotine at high doses is lethal

> and nicotine poisoning can happen at relatively

> low concentrations in small children.

>

>

> Lowlander Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > OK, can I make it clear - tobacco, burned and

> > inhaled, is lethal (i.e. cigarettes and rolling

> > tobacco).

> >

> > Nicotine on its own is not lethal. And if it

> is

> > ingested in ways other than inhaled is far less

> > addictive.


Same goes for caffeine, alcohol, vitamin E and a host of other things. But lets differentiate between the odd cigar or pipe and cigarettes or vaping. I had my new year cigar and had a lovely nicotine buzz...no inhaling, and not risk free - bur it I've no desire to have another for 6-12 months (or never again for that matter).

Nicotine is scientifically proven to be an addictive substance. Just because some people don't develop an addiction doesn't negate that. That is the case for all addictive substances including heroin.


I'm not saying vaping should be illegal but it has risks and its addictive and serves no useful purpose except helping people quit a more dangerous activity: smoking. For these reasons it shouldn't be available to those underage and it shouldn't be advertised. More pupils have tried vaping than have actually tried smoking. There is a BBC article on it.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-33635571

Agreed. Vaping should not be advertised as an alternative to smoking, but as an aid to quitting. It's also worth pointing out that E-cigs only started appearing after several countries/ states etc started to introduce smoking bans in public places. Proof as if any were needed that only legislation can force manufacturers to change. We shouldn't be afraid to demand regulation.

Yes, agreed, I should have said ads should only be allowed showing it as an aid to quitting smoking. I 100% agree that's fine.


Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed. Vaping should not be advertised as an

> alternative to smoking, but as an aid to quitting.

> It's also worth pointing out that E-cigs only

> started appearing after several countries/ states

> etc started to introduce smoking bans in public

> places. Proof as if any were needed that only

> legislation can force manufacturers to change. We

> shouldn't be afraid to demand regulation.

  • 10 months later...

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Agreed. Vaping should not be advertised as an

> alternative to smoking, but as an aid to quitting.



I can't see any exclusive contradictions between these two points. Vaping can be both an alternative way to deliver nicotine into one?s body, a less harmful substitute to traditional tobacco smoking, _and_ an aid to reduce consumption of the addictive substance for those who want such quitting. There are many eliquids http://gypsyvapes.com/Top-ELiquid-EJuice-Brands with zero nicotine, just water solution of PG/VG mixture and flavor.

  • 2 years later...

Hi there.

I usually read the latest news and studies on quitting smoking, vaping and cannabis industry here at Vapingdaily.

For example, this article https://vapingdaily.com/marijuana-side-effects/. By the way, my friend quit smoking thanks to vaping. So now I'm not so skeptical about that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also had a great experience using Niko to fix a leak which was going downstairs. He resolved another related problem while he was here, which I didn't even know we had. He's an excellent communicator and will definitely be my go to plumber, should I need one.  I can't recommend him highly enough.
    • 🤣 re your mystic powers! Didn't want to just put a 🤣 on your post in case people thought I was laughing because the cat had been found!
    • Hopefully, they won't wash the changing room mats poolside in future so the filters won't be overworked keeping the water clean!!!
    • I agree with your sentiment, however you are mistaken about the Dulwich Estate. Their sole purpose is to make as much money as possible to give to the schools they support, as well as the almshouses and other historical buildings. They do not care about social housing (except subsidised housing for teachers of the schools), refreshing the area, low-rent studios, charming but affordable pub, etc. While they are a charity, their purpose is very constrained/focused and whatever they do with this site, it has to make money for them. It's not that they're being nasty or stingy, it's just what their statutes tell them they have to do. Note that I am not defending them, but knowing the above helps understand why they do what they do, even if sometimes it seems to go against the wishes of the local community. They are not answerable to the local community, and their only oversight is the charity commission and the courts. And of course, like all bureaucracies (esp those with limited oversight), they look after themselves very well. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...