Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What was the Strategic Rail Authority at the time, did I believe, agree to reopen the station on the proviso that it would mean the closure of Loughborough station. The council wouldn't agree to this so it didn't happen.personally I thought that was a mistake at the time, as LJ is very close to both Brixton aoverground and underground station and those to the northwould be ceithin walking distance of Camberwell. To have the Thameslink serve Camberwell (a major town centre) makes more sense. I suspect similar conditions would be applied by Network rail even if they were willing to revisit this. With all the developments happening around Camberwell green and along the Thmes,ink line generally, I am surprised that section 106 conditions haven't been used to see he station funded.

Part of TfL's response to proposing NOT to have a Bakerloo line extension to Camberwell and Peckham was for a Thameslink station at Camberwell.


But I would imagine they intended for Sevenoaks trains only to stop at Camberwell which don't go to Loughborough station. So we'd keep Loughborough station and get a re opened Camberwell Station. But an extension of the Bakerloo line to Camberwell would have included an intermediate stop. So if the sop for not getting the Bakerloo line to Camberwell is over ground station - and proposals from TfL that the Sevenoaks trains e moved to London Overground franchise - then a station serving Walworth would also be needed to do the job properly. In fact a re opened Walworth station - both being closed at the same time in 1916 due to manpower shortages and didn't reopen due to competition from trams.

On email this am .......................


The Options Assessment Report for the Bakerloo line extension is now available online at tfl.gov.uk/bakerloo-extension.


The report considers the possible destinations that were suggested as part of the 2014 public consultation. It also further considers the options presented during the 2014 consultation.


A media release regarding the report and the project?s latest status is also available here.

https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2015/december/bakerloo-line-extension-to-improve-transport-links-in-south-london-by-2030

nunhead_man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On email this am .......................

>

> The Options Assessment Report for the Bakerloo

> line extension is now available online at

> tfl.gov.uk/bakerloo-extension.

>

> The report considers the possible destinations

> that were suggested as part of the 2014 public

> consultation. It also further considers the

> options presented during the 2014 consultation.

>

> A media release regarding the report and the

> project?s latest status is also available here.

> https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2

> 015/december/bakerloo-line-extension-to-improve-tr

> ansport-links-in-south-london-by-2030



If Sadiq Khan becomes LM then half of those 25,000 homes

should be affordable.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sarcasm?


The developers want (and may get) whats happening at Elephant now to extend all the

way down OKR I'd think.



Mind you - this was in the Guardian (referring to Khan) - Can't see it happening :).


"They will use the mayor?s planning powers to ensure half of the homes in any new

development are genuinely affordable, stop developers selling off new properties

to investors before they are finished, and set up a not for profit London-wide letting

agency that would reduce fees and offer tenants longer term lets."


http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/oct/26/government-housing-bill-accelerate-crisis-says-sadiq-khan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That said, organised displays could be on Saturday before and after and the actual day, and private ones could just not have the loud ones.  It’s all down to accessibility and people caring/not caring
    • The problem this year is that 5th November falls on a Wednesday. So some places will be bringing their "bonfire night" forward to Saturday 1st and some will be knocking it back to Saturday 8th and there'll probably be a few that just go with Wednesday 5th anyway. If you're doing a public display, having it on a weekend gets more crowds. Which basically means a solid week of fireworks.
    • Fireworks in this area do feel totally incessant at this time of year, almost every evening there is terrible noise. I feel great concern for wildlife, pets (I have a senior cat who hates them), as well as people who struggle with PTSD etc. Last year I even had people setting them off in front of my home. Tonight and yesterday evening have been particularly bad. Is there anything we can do as a community to prevent this? What action can we take? Surely we shouldn’t be expected to just put up with it every year for weeks on end! 
    • Does anyone know what time tonight's events, the second night of the new phenomenon of Halloween Fireworks, end? These do sound too major to be anything but large- scale organised events and they are loud, very loud. So anyone, for their own reasons, that dislikes or objects to this level of noise for the next x amount of hours, really has no choice in the matter! Could those addicted to loud bangs possibly have a kind of silent disco setup with the bangs sent through headphones, so the rest of us could be spared?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...