Jump to content

Recommended Posts

vinceayre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am just saying that the same scientists that

> have been telling us the we are all going to die

> unless we pay more tax, which is effectively the

> outcome of the climate change lobbyists, are now

> telling us that it has not got hotter in 15 years

> and that the global warming we are experiencing

> now may well have happened without our help

> before, which is what the sceptics have said all

> along.

>

> You have been conned but you cant accept it

> because it would make you look foolish.



head. brick wall.

Vince, this is crazy talk ;-)


Science has told us that Earth undergoes regular climate cycles. There's nothing new in that chappie - no epiphany, no revelation for the skeptics. You're not denying that, right?


A modicum of insight tells us that climate change, whether natural or man-made, is extremely bad news for a crowded planet with scarce resources and tribal mentalities. You're not denying that, right?


A vast consensus of quality science also tells us that human activity is currently ushering in the next climate change sequence, and doing it so fast that it represents a significant self-inflicted tragedy.


Attention seekers, nutjobs, conspiracy theorists and those working in the oil industry can be expected to challenge these findings for purely selfish reasons.


Frankly vinceayre, your assertion on tax is silly. With all the good reasons to be disappointed about climate change you have to go and make one up.


Climate change reduction involves moving away from consumption of hydrocarbon energy sources. This means raises of less than 5% in leccy bills to fund renewable sources, and more use of public transport. It recommends reducing senseless waste and over consumption. The impact on tax will be negligible.


Some commentators reckon it might have the impact of a reduction in GDP by as much as 1% - a figure which will have negligible impact on anyone's actual life. For comparison, the credit crunch created by the city boys created a shrink in GDP of at least 6%, and we're not bothered enough about that to legislate to prevent it happening again.


Amongst the positive by-products is a nicer place to live in, and less global instability.


With that in mind I correct my earlier statement. The witless, attention seekers, nutjobs, conspiracy theorists and those working in the oil industry can be expected to challenge these findings for purely selfish reasons.


Don't ally yourself with that gang Vince. It delivers you zero benefit.

Science has told us that Earth undergoes regular climate cycles. There's nothing new in that chappie - no epiphany, no revelation for the skeptics. You're not denying that, right?


No denial on that.


A vast consensus of quality science also tells us that human activity is currently ushering in the next climate change sequence, and doing it so fast that it represents a significant self-inflicted tragedy.

A large proportion of this science is based on data that we are not allowed to see, that leads me to question its validity.


Frankly vinceayre, your assertion on tax is silly. With all the good reasons to be disappointed about climate change you have to go and make one up. Climate change reduction involves moving away from consumption of hydrocarbon energy sources. This means raises of less than 5% in leccy bills to fund renewable sources, and more use of public transport. It recommends reducing senseless waste and over consumption. The impact on tax will be negligible.


Last year my energy bill was ?30,000 plus, i paid over ?1200.00 in climate change levy, a tax imposed on me by the government quite a few years ago. I estimate i have paid over ?5,000 in this tax since its inception. That may be nothing to you but to me its a lot of money.

I am a baker and waste is one of our cardinal sins so I am all for saving energy and time and materials.


Some commentators reckon it might have the impact of a reduction in GDP by as much as 1% - a figure which will have negligible impact on anyone's actual life. For comparison, the credit crunch created by the city boys created a shrink in GDP of at least 6%, and we're not bothered enough about that to legislate to prevent it happening again.


Agreed, but the boom they created in housing and capital wealth has made me and I suspect a lot of you reading this considerably richer. If you purchased a property in the mid nineties when Blair came to power it is now probably at least doubled in value even with the effect of the past three years taken into consideration. So yes their greed created this recession but it also created a huge wealth surge for the country as a whole.


I don't ally myself to anyone and change my mind on things quite often if i am wrong, I have yet to be convinced on this subject though.

Ah, the climate change levy for business.


Just wanted to highlight that, as it doesn't apply to domestic users - so we don't want any myths circulating.


It needs to be put in context. I'm guessing your overall business turnover may be 200k or more, including rates, salaries and baking ingredients etc.


If that were the case, that would make the levy 0.5% of your overall turnover - or a penny on a loaf.


I'd argue that a penny on a loaf is a small price to pay for climate stability, a green environment and political resolution. It would even lower your taxes by making cuts in the defence budgets needed to wage wars thousands of miles away to protect oil supplies which generate your electricity.

vinceayre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Last year my energy bill was ?30,000 plus, i paid

> over ?1200.00 in climate change levy, a tax

> imposed on me by the government quite a few years

> ago. I estimate i have paid over ?5,000 in this

> tax since its inception. That may be nothing to

> you but to me its a lot of money.

> I am a baker and waste is one of our cardinal sins

> so I am all for saving energy and time and

> materials.

>


I have some sympathy with you on this point but it doesn't follow that because climate change has been used to justify some arguably arbitraty and unfair taxes then climate change isn't happening.


Whether these taxes are fair or will make any difference to energy consumption is a whole different debate - but there are vested interests who use the 'it's just an excuse to make you pay more tax' arguments to sell their own agenda (conspiracy theorists, free marketeers, Jeremy Clarkson etc)

Ah, the climate change levy for business.


Just wanted to highlight that, as it doesn't apply to domestic users - so we don't want any myths circulating.


You say that like it doesn't effect people just business, business's are people especially small business's like mine. Every pound that we are taxed more is a pound less we can reinvest in the company. This government has continuously raised business taxes thinking wrongly that it does not effect people directly, they are so wrong in this belief.

I don't think for one minute that the government raises taxes because they think it doesn't affect people. After all, they micromanage VAT because they believe it controls the economy.


Either way, as Timster says, hating tax doesn't alter the reality of climate change.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello, I have seen several reviews written about Piplings Nursery from a number of years ago now. I would be keen to hear from any parents who have dealt with them more recently as we are interested in sending our son there.  Many thanks!
    • I wondered if anyone has tried an N Family nursery, particularly the new East Dulwich one but interested in reviews more generally? What are your experiences? 
    • My last paragraph was relevant. I was in central London having a meal with family on the same day as the recent large right wing march. The date of the  meal was arranged before it was known about the march, and the venue was convenient for one of my brothers and his partner, who had travelled down from the midlands and had a hotel and theatre tickets booked near the venue. It was just up the road from Trafalgar Square, and my partner and I were seriously concerned on the way there and the way back that we would encounter violent people from the march. Luckily we were able to avoid this, but as I expect you will have read, several police officers were injured, and a friend of mine was amongst a group of counter protesters who were hemmed in by marchers for hours, which was obviously very frightening. The group had to be protected by police before they were finally able to get a safe passage out. Therefore, I don't think my last paragraph was unnecessary at all in the context of when I personally feel unsafe in London. I am not "going through a bad patch", beansprout, not am I "having a bad day ". Nor do I need to "get things off my chest". I am interested to know how you think I have "totally changed my tune"? Could you give some examples from before and after I "changed my tune"? Perhaps you would like to come and discuss your opinion of me face to face? I am very easy to find. I run gigs and Singarounds locally with my lovely partner, and we have organised two Forum Drinks, with a break over the summer.  We will be organising an October meet up soon, so perhaps you would like to come to that, if music isn't your thing? You could take the opportunity to meet some other forum posters as well 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...