Jump to content

are there still any climate sceptics out there??? It's only 5mins...


Recommended Posts

vinceayre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am just saying that the same scientists that

> have been telling us the we are all going to die

> unless we pay more tax, which is effectively the

> outcome of the climate change lobbyists, are now

> telling us that it has not got hotter in 15 years

> and that the global warming we are experiencing

> now may well have happened without our help

> before, which is what the sceptics have said all

> along.

>

> You have been conned but you cant accept it

> because it would make you look foolish.



head. brick wall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vince, this is crazy talk ;-)


Science has told us that Earth undergoes regular climate cycles. There's nothing new in that chappie - no epiphany, no revelation for the skeptics. You're not denying that, right?


A modicum of insight tells us that climate change, whether natural or man-made, is extremely bad news for a crowded planet with scarce resources and tribal mentalities. You're not denying that, right?


A vast consensus of quality science also tells us that human activity is currently ushering in the next climate change sequence, and doing it so fast that it represents a significant self-inflicted tragedy.


Attention seekers, nutjobs, conspiracy theorists and those working in the oil industry can be expected to challenge these findings for purely selfish reasons.


Frankly vinceayre, your assertion on tax is silly. With all the good reasons to be disappointed about climate change you have to go and make one up.


Climate change reduction involves moving away from consumption of hydrocarbon energy sources. This means raises of less than 5% in leccy bills to fund renewable sources, and more use of public transport. It recommends reducing senseless waste and over consumption. The impact on tax will be negligible.


Some commentators reckon it might have the impact of a reduction in GDP by as much as 1% - a figure which will have negligible impact on anyone's actual life. For comparison, the credit crunch created by the city boys created a shrink in GDP of at least 6%, and we're not bothered enough about that to legislate to prevent it happening again.


Amongst the positive by-products is a nicer place to live in, and less global instability.


With that in mind I correct my earlier statement. The witless, attention seekers, nutjobs, conspiracy theorists and those working in the oil industry can be expected to challenge these findings for purely selfish reasons.


Don't ally yourself with that gang Vince. It delivers you zero benefit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Science has told us that Earth undergoes regular climate cycles. There's nothing new in that chappie - no epiphany, no revelation for the skeptics. You're not denying that, right?


No denial on that.


A vast consensus of quality science also tells us that human activity is currently ushering in the next climate change sequence, and doing it so fast that it represents a significant self-inflicted tragedy.

A large proportion of this science is based on data that we are not allowed to see, that leads me to question its validity.


Frankly vinceayre, your assertion on tax is silly. With all the good reasons to be disappointed about climate change you have to go and make one up. Climate change reduction involves moving away from consumption of hydrocarbon energy sources. This means raises of less than 5% in leccy bills to fund renewable sources, and more use of public transport. It recommends reducing senseless waste and over consumption. The impact on tax will be negligible.


Last year my energy bill was ?30,000 plus, i paid over ?1200.00 in climate change levy, a tax imposed on me by the government quite a few years ago. I estimate i have paid over ?5,000 in this tax since its inception. That may be nothing to you but to me its a lot of money.

I am a baker and waste is one of our cardinal sins so I am all for saving energy and time and materials.


Some commentators reckon it might have the impact of a reduction in GDP by as much as 1% - a figure which will have negligible impact on anyone's actual life. For comparison, the credit crunch created by the city boys created a shrink in GDP of at least 6%, and we're not bothered enough about that to legislate to prevent it happening again.


Agreed, but the boom they created in housing and capital wealth has made me and I suspect a lot of you reading this considerably richer. If you purchased a property in the mid nineties when Blair came to power it is now probably at least doubled in value even with the effect of the past three years taken into consideration. So yes their greed created this recession but it also created a huge wealth surge for the country as a whole.


I don't ally myself to anyone and change my mind on things quite often if i am wrong, I have yet to be convinced on this subject though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the climate change levy for business.


Just wanted to highlight that, as it doesn't apply to domestic users - so we don't want any myths circulating.


It needs to be put in context. I'm guessing your overall business turnover may be 200k or more, including rates, salaries and baking ingredients etc.


If that were the case, that would make the levy 0.5% of your overall turnover - or a penny on a loaf.


I'd argue that a penny on a loaf is a small price to pay for climate stability, a green environment and political resolution. It would even lower your taxes by making cuts in the defence budgets needed to wage wars thousands of miles away to protect oil supplies which generate your electricity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vinceayre Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Last year my energy bill was ?30,000 plus, i paid

> over ?1200.00 in climate change levy, a tax

> imposed on me by the government quite a few years

> ago. I estimate i have paid over ?5,000 in this

> tax since its inception. That may be nothing to

> you but to me its a lot of money.

> I am a baker and waste is one of our cardinal sins

> so I am all for saving energy and time and

> materials.

>


I have some sympathy with you on this point but it doesn't follow that because climate change has been used to justify some arguably arbitraty and unfair taxes then climate change isn't happening.


Whether these taxes are fair or will make any difference to energy consumption is a whole different debate - but there are vested interests who use the 'it's just an excuse to make you pay more tax' arguments to sell their own agenda (conspiracy theorists, free marketeers, Jeremy Clarkson etc)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, the climate change levy for business.


Just wanted to highlight that, as it doesn't apply to domestic users - so we don't want any myths circulating.


You say that like it doesn't effect people just business, business's are people especially small business's like mine. Every pound that we are taxed more is a pound less we can reinvest in the company. This government has continuously raised business taxes thinking wrongly that it does not effect people directly, they are so wrong in this belief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think for one minute that the government raises taxes because they think it doesn't affect people. After all, they micromanage VAT because they believe it controls the economy.


Either way, as Timster says, hating tax doesn't alter the reality of climate change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Well now you have asked.  Cycle paths are for cyclists so there is no question about 'taking over'.  Share paths are shared so there is no such thing as 'taking over'.  Footpaths, from my experience of many decades as a pedestrian, are mainly used by pedestrians so have not been taken over by cyclists.
    • Hi Tim,   I have a cd collection I want to get rid of, it's a mixture of everything really, I need to sort through it cos I want to keep a few. pm me if you're interested.   Cheers   Bruce
    • @Hen123 you really don't seem to have a grasp of conversational English yet, three times you have asked me the same question and three times I have given you the simple answer of I don't know  yet three times you have failed to comprehend it.  Multiple times I have asked you a simple "yes" / "no" question which is "Do you think all road users should obey ALL the rules?" But you are incapable of answering it. You are starting to sound lile a cheap knock off first gen AI Troll bot.  However, as that's what I believe you are, I will put this into French, just incase your developer wrote you in the international language of cyclists who all believe they are in the Tour De France "Pensez-vous que tous les usagers de la route devraient respecter TOUTES les règles ?"  If you fail to answer this time, then I conclude your computer programming says "No" and no further input from you is of any consequence to me or this discussion concerning poor cycling practices.   
    • At Goose Green early morning yesterday (before the festival [which was, as ever, a delight!]). If you think this may be yours/know whose it is, please PM me with details.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...