Jump to content

Recommended Posts

A thread on the main board made me decide to post here on a similar subject, one I know has been debated at length on the EDF but each situation differs.


Went for a spontaneous Friday night curry last week, to one of our popular local establishments. Three of us rocked up around 6.30pm, the place was quiet. 3 tables away was a family, 2 adults, 2 kids of around 4 years old. Didn't think anything at first but gradually the kids got more & more vocal. Tired, I guess. It got to the point that we kept having to stop our conversation because of the noise. It was 8pm by this point. What really struck me was the lack of any real effort by the parents to keep the noise down, given that this was now 8pm on a Friday night in an adult environment. There was the odd ineffectual 'shhh' but that was about it.


When they left shortly after 8, I spoke to one of the waiters (the manager, I was told, had gone out) I said that our evening had been badly interrupted by the noise, and asked if they (the staff) had noticed it. He said no, and that I should have complained at the time. I pointed out that this would have been impossible to do discreetly given where we were sitting, and would therefore have been embarrassing all round. He just shrugged.


I found this rather odd. My feeling is that the establishment concerned should be aware of awkward situations and deal with them tactfully, rather than waiting for complaints. I personally like this restaurant enough not to let one incident put me off, but the 2 friends I was with won't be going back, which just seems like an unnecessary shame all round. Would be curious to know what others think.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/91264-kids-in-restaurants/
Share on other sites

630-8 is probably just about perfect time for young parents to enjoy a curry with kids and still feel they are not interrupting evening diners, who I would say should be entitled to a child free space from around 8.


So from 6-8 I'd say you are eating early and expect same environment as say afternoon. So family-friendly dining ok at that time.


Question then is only if they were misbehaving and only the people there at the time can answer that.

It's tricky. Especially if you are not a parent yourself. Talking loudly, that is subjective. If the children were seated and otherwise behaving well then it's difficult to say what is the right volume for a conversation. The parents presumably were much closer to this "noise" and were not disturbed by it.

Interesting situation.

I was in a restaurant on Wednesday evening, something similar happened.

There was a table of 3, 2 men and 1 woman, sat a couple of tables away. They'd obviously had a few drinks and their conversation was frequently loud with huge guffaw outbursts. For long periods my friends and I had to halt our chats and wait to continue.

Is noise in a restaurant from children less valid than noise from adults ?

If not, then is your problem actually with kids rather than noise / distraction levels ?

i.e. If you'd had to stop your conversation because of adults, would you have started a thread about adults in restaurants ?

It's a Friday night after all, so some noise surely is to be expected - especially in a curry house, so who cares who it's from !?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's tricky. Especially if you are not a parent

> yourself. Talking loudly, that is subjective.


I'm not a parent and nor are my friends which almost certainly influences our response to those situations, admittedly. But this was not talking, it was shouting and screaming.


KidKruger Wrote:


--------------------------------------------------------

> There was a table of 3, 2 men and 1 woman, sat a couple of tables away. They'd obviously had a few drinks and their conversation was frequently loud with huge guffaw outbursts. For long periods my friends and I had to halt our chats and wait to continue.

> Is noise in a restaurant from children less valid than noise from adults ?

> If not, then is your problem actually with kids rather than noise / distraction levels ?

> i.e. If you'd had to stop your conversation because of adults, would you have started a thread about adults in restaurants ?


Well there's a difference isn't there - the people you describe sound rather insensitive and annoying, but as adults were entirely in control of their own behaviour. They chose to behave like that - we all do, now and again. Small children don't know any better so they (and their restaurant neighbours) are entirely dependent on their parents to make sure their behaviour isn't impacting negatively on anyone else. That didn't happen in this case. So, to reiterate, the noise was the problem for us, not their presence there. Seen and not heard? Sometimes, yes please! :)


Blah Blah - Hope you have a great time - I have no doubt everyone will be impeccably behaved! ;-)

If it is noise we are talking about, then yes you will have drinking and insensitive people regardless of age in restaurants. I don't think you can police parents taking kids into restaurants after a certain time either. It's more about a cultural shift I would suggest. Years ago a parent would never take their kids out after a certain time of night at the risk of offending other diners, simple as that really. It seems, particularly in the last 10/15 years, parents (in general) seem to assume that we all want to hear and be involved in their offsprings temper tantrums and running around in a public setting. I've seen it with my own eyes, mothers in groups allowing children to run around and cause havoc in restaurants and pubs, it's not on. Manners cost nothing.


Louisa.

Agree with some of that Louisa, particularly the entitled attitude of some parents, but this isn't intended as a debate on whether kids should be out after a certain time, or taken to certain establishments. That's been done many times (and some of my best friends are parents ;-)) Well behaved kids are welcome wherever and whenever, as far as I'm concerned. Was just surprised that the restaurant's approach was a shrug of the shoulder and an 'it's your problem' attitude, even when I mentioned that my friends were unlikely to return.


The real fault however, lay with the parents IMHO.

Fair enough, but this was 2 kids shouting at the tops of their voices in a quiet space....difficult to miss...


Maybe I'm being naive but I would expect restaurant management to want their customers to be happy, not just with the food but with the surroundings too, and therefore make it their business to notice when all is not well.

As Louisa suggests, it's a question of cultural expectations. In some other countries it's quite normal for very young kids to still be up in the evening, and taken to restaurants. But in the UK.. despite the undeniable shift L talks about... I think we still expect restaurants to be adult environments after 7:30 or so.


While I agree it's hard for restaurants to enforce, I think a 4 yr old in a restaurant at 8pm is pushing the social norms a bit.

I have been on holiday in Spain many times and I agree entirely that continental attitudes to kids in late night surroundings is very different to here in the UK. The old school British attitude (regardless of class), was that kids should be seen and not heard (unless it's in a specific area of the restaurant/pub) and before a specified time in the evening (when a restaurant and pub should be the preserve of adults). I think alongside this cultural shift (which is age based in terms of the parents more so than ever), there has also been a specific ED 'nappy valley' phenomenon going on here too. Many local businesses now rely on the yummy pound, and often times they rely on the parent and child/family custom as much/if not more than they do the exclusive adult market. Management will inevitably be more lenient to this group because end of the day it's their bread and butter.


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But in the UK..

> despite the undeniable shift L talks about... I

> think we still expect restaurants to be adult

> environments after 7:30 or so.


By and large I would probably agree, but actually don't feel that strongly unless the behaviour and noise level affects everyone else. That's plain selfish, and bad parenting IMO. The adults KidKruger encountered the other night were probably brought up similarly ;-)


There was no question that the staff knew we were being disturbed, I caught their eye enough times. A quiet word from them would seem the obvious thing to me. They do run the place after all, and it would nicely de-personalise an awkward situation between fellow diners.

But they "left shortly after 8". If they came in to sit down at 7:30 - 8, I'd be the first to think WTF. But if they're finishing their meal and settling up around 8 that's fair enough.


I do agree that parents should keep their kids reasonably quiet, and for all I know these parents could be the most selfish people in. London. But from the OP, Isee no problems with times or response of the staff.

HelBel65 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fair enough, but this was 2 kids shouting at the

> tops of their voices in a quiet space....difficult

> to miss...

>

> Maybe I'm being naive but I would expect

> restaurant management to want their customers to

> be happy, not just with the food but with the

> surroundings too, and therefore make it their

> business to notice when all is not well.



Possible they're regular customers and good spenders so management don't want to upset them? I have no idea of course, but there could be any number of perspectives that differed from yours in this situation.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HelBel65 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Fair enough, but this was 2 kids shouting at

> the

> > tops of their voices in a quiet

> space....difficult

> > to miss...

> >

> > Maybe I'm being naive but I would expect

> > restaurant management to want their customers

> to

> > be happy, not just with the food but with the

> > surroundings too, and therefore make it their

> > business to notice when all is not well.

>

>

> Possible they're regular customers and good

> spenders so management don't want to upset them? I

> have no idea of course, but there could be any

> number of perspectives that differed from yours in

> this situation.


True. Just a shame that the idea of a quiet word could potentially cause that level of offence.

Tbh if I ran a business and I had regular customers in (be they family, couples or even individuals), I might think twice about pulling them up on something like this. I'd rather lose the custom of some irregular visitors over well paying regulars who I know will be back to spend again. Harsh, but true (if that's the case).


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tbh if I ran a business and I had regular

> customers in (be they family, couples or even

> individuals), I might think twice about pulling

> them up on something like this. I'd rather lose

> the custom of some irregular visitors over well

> paying regulars who I know will be back to spend

> again. Harsh, but true (if that's the case).

>

> Louisa.


Yes, I did wonder if this was the case and of course I can understand that. Just a shame staff had to choose.....my friends and I are big spenders when in the mood!

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emoticons/drink/smileys-drinking-beer.gif

I used to not have particularly high expectations of behaviour in a curry house. I wonder if the parents thought they were in a relatively relaxed environment, unaware of stressed fellow customers.


Make a complaint at the time either to the staff or the family directly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...