Jump to content

Toyota and other 4x4 recalls (Warning: it's sexist but funny)


Recommended Posts

It's against women who can't see out the back of their unnecessary massive 4x4s.

That is it.

They're too stupid and ignorant to known when they're being taken the piss out of, so don't feel you're offending them by continuing to do so, they won't know!

Well , basically it's saying 'all 4x4 drivers are ****, especially the woman ones with their brats and rich husbands' this may or may not be true but why don't they say it...this is just a puerile, unfunny thing to me. No problem with the target but it's schoolboy execution....innit, the Mash would do this far better.

Why do you mention Picts and Scots in the same post as midgets & dwarves? Have you been watching too much Lord Of The Rings?


I think you are a closet "heightist" and probably think Scots are short mean people who despite being short can?t reach the bottom of their pockets. Shame, shame. Hoots.



SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It is 'littlepeoplist' for a start,

>

> and I have nothing against dwarves or midgets,

>

> or giants and ogres,

>

> Picts and Scots or

>

> Angles and Saxons.

Hurrah, I agree with you all. And it's not just because of the champagne I've just opened in the office. I'm inclined to think that Quids and Sean probably ARE lacking sleep and are too cool respectively, but top and bottom, they're right, it isn't funny. And is a bit lazy and rubbish.


Now the story in the papers this week that men really are better parkers than women on the other hand...

Generally speaking men have better spacial awareness than women so that would make them better at parking.

Thankfully motorcycles park easy in little spaces...


Oh - and to the woman talking on her mobile whilst badly driving her 4x4 past PetsSmart at noon today, who then screamed and yelled at me when I had the audacity to shout at her for nearly driving into me as I was waiting to pull out, and THEN she nearly hit a bus - HHAHAHHAAAHAHHHAHAAHHAHAHAHA. Her kids in the back seat not strapped in were looking a bit anxious too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...