Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dear Forum


I'd like to make you aware of a public consultation currently open from NHS England regarding the provision of PET/CT imaging services.


Of particular importance for patients/relatives is questions 5:

"What characteristics do you consider important for patients when accessing PET-CT services, e.g. quality of the service, quality of the outcome, travel distance, accessibility by public transport, car parking, hours/times the service is available?"


Currently your nearest scanner is at King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill.https://www.kch.nhs.uk/service/cancer/tests-and-investigations/pet-scan


One thing you may want to consider is that if you were an inpatient at King's, needing an urgent scan, is being transported to another hospital satisfactory?


Disclosure: I work at King's.


Thanks, Ben.


Full details below.


https://www.engage.england.nhs.uk/survey/pet-ct-services/consult_view


PET-CT services: design of phase 2 procurement process

Overview


PET-CT, or positron emission tomography-computerised tomography, is used to produce detailed three-dimensional images of the inside of the body. An advantage of a PET-CT scan is that it can show how well certain parts of your body are working, rather than just showing what it looks like. PET-CT is particularly helpful for investigating confirmed cases of cancer, but is used in other conditions as well.


In 2014, NHS England carried out a procurement process for around 50% of PET-CT activity, known as PET-CT phase 1. The National PET-CT contract replaced two contracts, PET-CT North and South, which were running out. NHS England now intends to carry out a phase 2 procurement process for PET-CT activity not included in phase 1.


The aim is to procure services that improve patient experience and access to care, achieve the best clinical outcomes for patients, ensure an equitable service across the country and that all providers work to a consistent service specification, ensure adequate PET-CT provision in the future and provide best value for money.


The proposed process will seek bids from providers to deliver services in 9 different lots that are geographically defined ? though it is possible for there to be multiple PET-CT sites within each lot. In addition, the proposal includes a maximum single price for scans, and a limit on the number of lots any one bidder can be awarded to maintain plurality of supply.


This does mean that the location of PET-CT services could potentially change from where they are currently provided. However, until the procurement process is more advanced, we will not have sight of proposed solutions, and therefore any proposed changes to service location or the potential impact for patients. At that later point, any potential change in location of PET-CT services may be the subject of public consultation.


NHS England is now to conduct a 30 day period of engagement with patients, public, providers and other interested parties to test the proposals prior to beginning the procurement. We are also seeking views on potential mitigation for any change in location of PET-CT services that could be built into the service requirements for bids.



http://www3.gehealthcare.com/~/media/images/product/product-categories/pet-ct/discovery-pet-ct-710/discovery_pet_ct_710_spolight3.jpg


http://www.upmc.com/patients-visitors/education/PublishingImages/T-Z/PETCT-1.jpg

As someone whose partner recently made much use of the imaging services at King's, I was happy to complete the survey. I encourage anyone with an opinion about our local hospital to do likewise. It's actually a rather complex subject that I didn't have time to research; what I did was answer most questions "Unsure" and pasted the following into each text box: "I have no idea. What I want is for full imaging services to remain at King's College Hospital at their current levels." Might help..
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. It's so important that patients are involved in these consultations, otherwise bureaucrats and vested interests are just talking to each other in a closed loop! I've completed the survey (despite its jargon-tastic appearance). While not referring directly to Kings, I just kept making points like how existing provision needs to be taken into account because it's both financially and environmentally wasteful not to do this. And it being costly and risky to transport ill patients around. And so on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit of a long shot but I'm on the lookout for a portable pop-up counter or podium.   The kind you often see on a high street, used by charities or utility companies to advertise their wares.   I've included a photo to give you the idea. I'm a peckham-based artist and am looking for one for a free (and non-profit) community art project.  It can be in any workable condition and can already have signage on it as we will remove and redecorate ourselves.    Thanks in advance, Linzie
    • No I absolutely did not - that much is clear. Have you read the latest stories about Unite, Len and the hotel in Birmingham? The UK electorate were smart enough to reject a far-left party in 2019, let's hope they are smart enough to reject a far-right party at the next election too. If not we are all doomed.
    • I would also like to add my recommendation for James.  I had taken four names of electricians from the forum - in the order I had read the reviews.  First three no response - even days later. I phoned James this morning. He answered, gave me a time, stuck to it, messaged again 15 mins before arrival.  He fixed my problem on the spot.  Sensible charge out fee. Perfect service.  
    • Most recent polls for the next election suggest it will be a hung parliament, with Reform the largest party by a fair margin. But that is predicated on Reform finding around 300 candidates who are actually electable. Given the number of Reform council candidates who have had to drop out prior to or after the local elections, does that seem likely? Social media is pretty unforgiving when it comes to finding skeletons in cupboards; a retweet or a like seems enough to scupper political ambitions. A few may defect from other parties, but do you think the electorate would really vote for so many brand new MPs from a newish party?  I'm not so sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...