Jump to content

Recommended Posts

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You're the expert.

>

>

> You told me home advantage for England was

> immense.


I've forgotten what happened this morning never mind what I say to you when I'm half cut. But yes it is I think a massive advantage and probably a decent bet. if someone can beat the AB's for you that would be nice too.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Indeed. I bet the US at 34/1 :)


Trade it quick.


Stick to your original England bet.


Don't forget that in rugby, on the line is over the line, so it will all be a legit home world cup this time. No Azerbeijani officiados needed.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fiji to be leading at HT tomorrow is 8/1.

>

> USA and Scotland are in the same Group as S.Africa

> so I don't think DC meant both.


Well obvs I didn't mean that both will qualify - given RSA are a given that's not possible. But without looking at the odds I thought both might be given a decent shout of reaching the QFs. USA have some very mobile backs with a 7s pedigree. Shame Carlin Isles isn't here though - the quickest man in rugby.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Mick Mac Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > You're the expert.

> >

> >

> > You told me home advantage for England was

> > immense.

>

> I've forgotten what happened this morning never

> mind what I say to you when I'm half cut. But yes

> it is I think a massive advantage and probably a

> decent bet. if someone can beat the AB's for you

> that would be nice too.


Will Twickenham be filled with Englishmen - or is there a

quota for us Wales fans :)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the biggest news in the world of rugby today

> ... The Gavin Henson interview

>

> http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-new

> s/gavin-henson-interview-still-believe-10079935


"but I age differently to most people"... Dorian Grey

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Alan Medic Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > England drop Ford for Farrell. Anyone agree

> that's

> > a good decision? I don't.

>

> Gives us hope - Apparently to counter Welsh play -

> but

> you play to your strengths - don't you.


Ford must be peed off. As for having Burgess in the centre I think that's an experiment waiting to fail. I hope I don't have to eat my words if England wallop the Wales 2nd XV

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You are right . It isn't going to change him for the better. Sending such a negative message is potentially counter-productive. Trump is narcissistic, arrogant, unpredictable, spiteful, divisive, and dishonest, with a penchant for a total a disregard for democratic norms.  He is one who bears a grudge so there's a case to be made for not offending him as he could react with a bunch of  adverse actions  such as  deciding to increase import tariffs on UK exports to the US.      
    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...