Jump to content

Roof "too low" for decent loft conversion, so...


Recommended Posts

..how much would it be to raise the roof a full 7" (200mm) or so?

If anyone has had this dilemma, please let me know - via PM if you like.

(I have been told by an architect that the space is low, so the headroom is likely to be very low without raising the whole roof.)


This from the architect:


From examination of the existing loft space the height from top of ceiling joists to underside of the ridge member is only about 2350mm, to provide an adequate loft extension this height should ideally be a minimum of around 2500mm. This would enable the installation of a new loft floor (including beams), a ceiling height of 2300mm for a bedroom and a rear dormer roof. The planning ? permitted development guidelines require the dormer roof not to exceed the existing ridge height of the roof. If we could obtain planning permission to raise the roof line by about 200mm (this would require a complete new roof) it would help considerably on the height issue, however approval cannot be guaranteed.

I would speak to a builder, not an architect. The former will give you a realistic assessment, based on a 'pragmatic' interpretation of the rules (an architect will not). If you look at most of the lost conversions around SE22, they've all taken slightly liberal interpretations of what you're allowed to do with roof heights. Obviously you wouldn't want to do anything to incur the wrath of the local planners, but most builders find a few inches here and there and manage to make it work without taking outrageous liberties.

Obviously the higher the ceiling height, the better, but it's not uncommon to end up with a ceiling height less than the 2.3m your architect is suggesting. Unless the Building Regs have recently changed, there is no legal minimum ceiling height. However there is still a practical minimum height you should work to in loft conversions of at least 2.1m throughout (standard ceiling height elsewhere should be at least 2.4m). Ideally in rooms with sloping ceilings, at least 50% of the floor area should have a floor to ceiling height of at least 2.1m. I recently saw a rear dormer conversion where the ceiling height was only 2.05m because of existing parameters. I'm 6 foot plus, yes it felt lower than normal, but most loft conversions tend to have a 'quirky' feel to them anyway. If you can, you should try and view a loft conversion with a ceiling height lower than your architect is suggesting.


rahrahrah, I get where you're coming from, but unless you can find a builder that will guarantee at their expense, any remedial works needed to conform to Permitted Development or Planning Permission should the planners find out the builder has been too 'liberal' in their interpretation, then there is a large financial risk for the householder if they get 'found out'. Trust me, some planning officers can be real sticklers for regulations. By law an architect has to carry professional indemnity insurance, so therefore they can at least be sued for giving bad professional advice. With a builder you'll be lucky to get more than a shrug of the shoulders out of them if things go wrong...

Sounds like you are in a very similar position to where we found ourselves at during the initial stages of investigating loft conversion. We are now just about finished a loft conversion where we have lowered the ceilings on 1st floor. We lowered them between 15-20cm (as much as we could without interfering with the windows on 1st floor). We were told there was no chance of raising the ridge being accepted for planning...I have seen a number of houses where they have "Nudged" the ridge but you can only get about 5cm doing this. PM me if you want to ask any more questions.
Penguinpost, what height are you left with in the first floor rooms after lowering the ceilings and what impact has it had on the feel of those rooms? And what height have you achieved in the loft rooms? We too have a low pitch to our roof and had four companies round who all had different views on what we could do and what was best.

In the loft we have 2.2m (still need carpets fitted). It feels decently roomy above head height (I'm 6ft and husband is 6'3 so was v important to have decent height up there). On floor 1 we have really high cellings - guessing 2.8m (no way I could reach the ceiling even if I stand on a chair). Honestly you can't even notice the ceiling are lower.

We were given 3 options -

1. Classic said do without lowering ceilings on floor 1 and it would be fine (weren't convinced about that, they insisted it would be fine)

2. Someone else said to us to lower more than we had and the Windows on floor 1 would get in the way so we should have some weird step thing in the ceiling ( I HATED the sound of this and was no way going to do it)

3. Lower ceilings to the top of Windows (15-20cm) and take The height difference into the loft as a result


We did the 3rd option and I'm really happy with our choice. Yes it's messy (very) but I think worth it to get 2.2m in the loft.

Yes, lowering the ceilings is very common... should definitely be the first option to investigate.


Raising the roof height falls outside of permitted development, and I think you're very unlikely to get planning approved for it. However - some builders (naming no names) cheekily raise the roof apex by 5-10cm or so, assuming nobody will notice/complain. Depends how comfortable you are with bending the rules.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...