Jump to content

Roof "too low" for decent loft conversion, so...


Recommended Posts

..how much would it be to raise the roof a full 7" (200mm) or so?

If anyone has had this dilemma, please let me know - via PM if you like.

(I have been told by an architect that the space is low, so the headroom is likely to be very low without raising the whole roof.)


This from the architect:


From examination of the existing loft space the height from top of ceiling joists to underside of the ridge member is only about 2350mm, to provide an adequate loft extension this height should ideally be a minimum of around 2500mm. This would enable the installation of a new loft floor (including beams), a ceiling height of 2300mm for a bedroom and a rear dormer roof. The planning ? permitted development guidelines require the dormer roof not to exceed the existing ridge height of the roof. If we could obtain planning permission to raise the roof line by about 200mm (this would require a complete new roof) it would help considerably on the height issue, however approval cannot be guaranteed.

I would speak to a builder, not an architect. The former will give you a realistic assessment, based on a 'pragmatic' interpretation of the rules (an architect will not). If you look at most of the lost conversions around SE22, they've all taken slightly liberal interpretations of what you're allowed to do with roof heights. Obviously you wouldn't want to do anything to incur the wrath of the local planners, but most builders find a few inches here and there and manage to make it work without taking outrageous liberties.

Obviously the higher the ceiling height, the better, but it's not uncommon to end up with a ceiling height less than the 2.3m your architect is suggesting. Unless the Building Regs have recently changed, there is no legal minimum ceiling height. However there is still a practical minimum height you should work to in loft conversions of at least 2.1m throughout (standard ceiling height elsewhere should be at least 2.4m). Ideally in rooms with sloping ceilings, at least 50% of the floor area should have a floor to ceiling height of at least 2.1m. I recently saw a rear dormer conversion where the ceiling height was only 2.05m because of existing parameters. I'm 6 foot plus, yes it felt lower than normal, but most loft conversions tend to have a 'quirky' feel to them anyway. If you can, you should try and view a loft conversion with a ceiling height lower than your architect is suggesting.


rahrahrah, I get where you're coming from, but unless you can find a builder that will guarantee at their expense, any remedial works needed to conform to Permitted Development or Planning Permission should the planners find out the builder has been too 'liberal' in their interpretation, then there is a large financial risk for the householder if they get 'found out'. Trust me, some planning officers can be real sticklers for regulations. By law an architect has to carry professional indemnity insurance, so therefore they can at least be sued for giving bad professional advice. With a builder you'll be lucky to get more than a shrug of the shoulders out of them if things go wrong...

Sounds like you are in a very similar position to where we found ourselves at during the initial stages of investigating loft conversion. We are now just about finished a loft conversion where we have lowered the ceilings on 1st floor. We lowered them between 15-20cm (as much as we could without interfering with the windows on 1st floor). We were told there was no chance of raising the ridge being accepted for planning...I have seen a number of houses where they have "Nudged" the ridge but you can only get about 5cm doing this. PM me if you want to ask any more questions.
Penguinpost, what height are you left with in the first floor rooms after lowering the ceilings and what impact has it had on the feel of those rooms? And what height have you achieved in the loft rooms? We too have a low pitch to our roof and had four companies round who all had different views on what we could do and what was best.

In the loft we have 2.2m (still need carpets fitted). It feels decently roomy above head height (I'm 6ft and husband is 6'3 so was v important to have decent height up there). On floor 1 we have really high cellings - guessing 2.8m (no way I could reach the ceiling even if I stand on a chair). Honestly you can't even notice the ceiling are lower.

We were given 3 options -

1. Classic said do without lowering ceilings on floor 1 and it would be fine (weren't convinced about that, they insisted it would be fine)

2. Someone else said to us to lower more than we had and the Windows on floor 1 would get in the way so we should have some weird step thing in the ceiling ( I HATED the sound of this and was no way going to do it)

3. Lower ceilings to the top of Windows (15-20cm) and take The height difference into the loft as a result


We did the 3rd option and I'm really happy with our choice. Yes it's messy (very) but I think worth it to get 2.2m in the loft.

Yes, lowering the ceilings is very common... should definitely be the first option to investigate.


Raising the roof height falls outside of permitted development, and I think you're very unlikely to get planning approved for it. However - some builders (naming no names) cheekily raise the roof apex by 5-10cm or so, assuming nobody will notice/complain. Depends how comfortable you are with bending the rules.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...