Jump to content

Recommended Posts

[email protected] Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Please let me know why my recommendations are

> removed shortly after I have posted them


I suspect all your recommendations for the same two businesses were moved to the ED businesses, restaurants & trades section where they belong. I have to say, the continued re-recommendations are starting to look a bit suspicious.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> [email protected] Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Please let me know why my recommendations are

> > removed shortly after I have posted them

>

> I suspect all your recommendations for the same

> two businesses were moved to the ED businesses,

> restaurants & trades section where they belong. I

> have to say, the continued re-recommendations are

> starting to look a bit suspicious.


It is weird...her, the gardener and the plumber seem to have some kind of recommendation triangle going on :


http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?30,1151522,1151522#msg-1151522

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I wouldn't describe the forum's reaction to legal

> threats as giving businesses "preferential

> treatment", but I know what you mean.

> I shall lift the ban to see the effect.


Yes, I know what you mean as well but it was always a bit irksome that positive reviews were obviously allowed to remain as it seemed slightly unbalanced.


Thanks for the clarification.

"I have worked very hard to gain respect with my customers "


The irony being that it has been much easier to lose the respect of many more potential customers with your hectoring tone on here


If you were the last gardener in south east London I wouldn't use you if you paid me


You can put that on your business card if you like

  • Administrator

I know you have sent me a PM. Before I get back to you please could you edit your posts that break the rules?


Clue:

"- Do not repetitively post about you services offered, this includes continuously offering your services to people with "I've PM'd you mate", "thanks for the recommendation" and "I can do that for you" messages."

and

http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/search.php?12,search=saied,page=1,match_type=AUTHOR,match_dates=0,match_forum=ALL

  • Administrator

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Admin, has it ever got as far as a solicitor's

> letter?


Sorry this got lost in the flood. No, there hasn't been solicitor's letters but I have been contacted by the police about complaints they've had. Yes, they and I know it's not criminal, but in order to keep the peace we decided that the removal of some posts would be a good idea.

Hello,


I've just tried to edit my profile to use a more up to date email address, which worked ok until I was asked to input the verification code. I've checked both old and new email (no code email found) and reviewed your FAQs without joy.


Would really appreciate your help,


Many thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So irrespective of the scandal how do you think that Rayner did as Housing Secretary?  
    • The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!
    • I don't really care about political sleaze in this  i am more concerned about thjle ability to run.a country without running it into the ground. Currently, labout seem to be heading straight towards the rocks, ignoring the warning blasts from the economic ighthouse. 
    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...