Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can no longer get into page 3 at all, and whatever way I try I get this:


Error 400


We're sorry, but we could not fulfill your request for /forum/read.php?5,392355,page=3 on this server.


Your proxy server sent an invalid request. Please contact the proxy server administrator to have this problem fixed.


Your technical support key is: c35d-1261-b783-0251


You can use this key to fix this problem yourself.


If you are unable to fix the problem yourself, please contact db at eastdulwichforum.co.uk and be sure to provide the technical support key shown above.



(I tried the fix it yourself link but got a strange message. Has this page been corrupted in some way?)

  • Administrator

400 errors:

"95% of the time this is because of a problem on the client system e.g. there is something unstable on your PC running the Web browser."


http://www.checkupdown.com/status/E400.html


Have a look on that website and run through their list of questions, it may well be your browser.


And try running this programme on your computer http://www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/ it's free and will clean things off your computer.

Thanks will try that, but according to the second message I get (see below) it is due to security software protecting the East Dulwich Forum website?


Is that likely? Nothing has changed at my end so far as I'm aware, and this is the only website I am getting these messages on! Thanks.


Technical Support


Your request was intercepted by Bad Behavior, security software which protects the Web site you visited from malicious activity, such as hackers, spam and viruses. We apologize for the inconvenience, but your request matched a profile of suspicious activity. This problem is usually quite easy to fix.


Your computer appears to have sent a request through a proxy server which corrupted the request. Uninstall the proxy server and try again. It is not normally enough to simply disable the proxy server. If you are required to use the proxy server, contact the proxy server administrator for assistance.


This problem may be caused by misconfigured or malfunctioning browser privacy software or personal firewall software. If you use this type of software, turn it off or reconfigure it and try again. (Example: For Norton Internet Security, you need to disable the Stealth Mode Browsing feature.)


This problem may be caused by viruses or spyware on your computer, or by malicious software that pretends to be anti-virus or anti-spyware software. Ensure that you have REAL anti-virus and anti-spyware software on your computer, that they are kept up-to-date, and that you have run a full system scan using each tool. Once your system is cleaned of viruses and spyware, please try your request again.


The free Microsoft Security Essentials provides reasonable protection against a wide variety of malicious software.


If the above suggestions fail to resolve the problem, click Back and contact the e-mail address you were given for further assistance.

  • Administrator

Hi


It seems out protective outer force field, known as Bad Behaviour, occasionally does not like your ISP. What happens is it gets a list of naughty IP addresses from a server, those on the naughty list are ones that have been accused of sending out spam. You both have the same ISP, AOL, which tells us that someone has been using their AOL account to send spam and AOL have not dealt with them quickly enough and therefore one of the AOL servers has been put on the list. Unfortunately we cannot take down the force field to alleviate this problem for the two of you as it would open us up to attack from many others, Bad Behaviour is something that helps keep this forum spam free.


So all we can do is wait, it is out of our hands but AOL will know how to remove their server from the blacklist. Sorry we cannot do any more to help.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...