Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Just to clarify Blanche's post

>

> (1) Tree surgeons WILL NOT disturb nesting birds -

> I was talking to one recently who described the

> frustration of rigging up to pollard a tree and

> then coming face to face with an 'early bird' in a

> nest and having to de-rig and wait for autumn.

> There is actually now a narrow window to achieve

> this work before nesting begins - a hold-up for

> which I am sure ssw takes the bow.

>

> (2) 'Smaller trees' would be sapling growth.

>

> (3) - as edhistory notes.

>

> The fact that Southwark is 'moving swiftly'

> reflects the narrow window they have now to

> achieve what they want before nesting actually

> does begin and (I suspect) the end of the budget

> year. The sooner the ground is cleared and made

> ready for burials, the sooner can the replanting

> begin with as much of this 'growing year' left for

> establishing the re-planting.

>

> Oh - and 'environmental crime'? - Come on.


(1) Supposition

(2) Not so. Have seen the smaller trees chopped down - none were saplings or could have been be classed as one in the last few years at least.

(3) I suspect your statement about the budget period is probably true, but again supposition as the council will not reveal the financing around all this. Have you wondered why?


Re environmental crime: if nesting birds or bat roosts are disturbed, whether occupied or not, then this would be literally true. There is little point in complaining about it afterwards. Besides that, the loss of precious woodland on One Tree hill is viewed very dimly by locally residents and this is confirmed by the council's own consultations. Some would see this as criminal and, morally, I agree.

Come and witness an environmental crime in your own back garden.


Photo attached was taken in the One Tree Hill Nature Reserve on One Tree Hill yesterday afternoon. The view is across the boundary fence into Camberwell New Cemetery.


Today, 12 noon Wednesday 15th March 2017


Southwark Council are cutting a quarter of an acre of trees in bird nesting season in the buffer zone on One Tree Hill next to the Ancient Woodland Nature Reserve, part of the Great North Wood.


The Glade. The highest point in Camberwell New Cemetery, Brenchley Gardens SE23 3RD (not the Old Cemetery on Forest Hill Road but the NEW Cemetery). Enter the cemetery from the Main Gate and walk up the hill to the right. Or coming from Honor Oak Park Station, enter the cemetery and walk to the left.


Our notice: [www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

or call Lewis 07886 504 221


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods

HopOne wrote - in reference to my statement that tree surgeons wouldn't disturb nesting birds:-


(1) Supposition


NO - it is the law - The Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 https://www.rspb.org.uk/our-work/our-positions-and-campaigns/positions/wildbirdslaw/birdsandlaw/wca/ and I think it most unlikely that Tree Operatives working for the council would knowingly breach this.

If there were birds nesting you can bet your bottom dollar Lewis would have filmed them when he yomped through the undergrowth the other day.


Also, if it's nesting season then surely SSW should protest somewhere they won't be disturbing the wildlife? Why not the council offices?

I can assure you that any council would not risk disturbing nesting birds.


I worked at a council where contractors did this, and there was an outcry.


The situation re the cemetery has been made so sensitive that that there is absolutely no way things will not be done to the letter of the law.

Dear HopOne


Firstly, disturbing nesting birds (however you disturb them) is contrary to the act. I think that assuming that council operatives will not break the law is better than 'a supposition'. Particularly in a time/ place which is getting a lot of publicity. (Cross posted with Sue - sorry)


Secondly - (an earlier remark of yours) - you may be confusing sapling with seedling. Saplings can be both quite old and relatively substantial. This website may help you http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-tree-sapling.htm .

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Dear HopOne

>

> Firstly, disturbing nesting birds (however you

> disturb them) is contrary to the act. I think that

> assuming that council operatives will not break

> the law is better than 'a supposition'.

> Particularly in a time/ place which is getting a

> lot of publicity. (Cross posted with Sue - sorry)

>

> Secondly - (an earlier remark of yours) - you may

> be confusing sapling with seedling. Saplings can

> be both quite old and relatively substantial. This

> website may help you

> http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-tree-sapling.htm

> .


Given that the area is audibly alive with birdsong and that the programme of works has started, please excuse a supposition that felling could ensue, given that council operatives have drawn up this plan. There is nothing wrong with drawing attention to these facts as the danger of illegal activity is there - I very much hope you are right though. As I mentioned earlier, there is little point in complaining about it afterwards.


Some of the trees which were felled were well in excess of 10ft tall so according to your definition not saplings.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Birds sing throughout the year. They sing less,

> some species, once they are paired and nesting.


So? Do they also keep quiet when the others are nesting? The point of saying this is that there are many birds in the area. If they are not nesting they are thinking about it.

The official timeframe for not carrying out work is during the bird nesting season - February to August. The Arboricultural Association website states this - "The ?Bird Nesting Season? is officially from February until August (Natural England) and it is recommended that vegetation works (tree or hedge cutting) or site clearance should be done outside of the nesting season." The council put in their planning application that clearance of trees and scrub would not be carried out during the bird nesting season. That is why all the cemetery and environmental groups who are concerned about the cemeteries are up in arms about what the council is doing - the council obviously consider it's o.k.to not abide by the terms of the planning permission they gave themselves.

For the record Blanche and co used the nesting birds wheeze last year, no doubt they'll be using next year as well. Cry wolf or is that fox!!


Environmental crime is an illegal act which directly harms the environment. (wikipedia definition) If you are going state something, is it to difficult to actually be factual about what is stated


I totally agree with Penguin 68 "The sooner the ground is cleared and made ready for burials, the sooner can the replanting begin with as much of this 'growing year' left for establishing the re-planting."

kiera Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> council put in their planning application that

> clearance of trees and scrub would not be carried

> out during the bird nesting season.


That's very nearly right. But the words in the conservation strategy, based on the arboricultural assessment that was a condition of the planning application (which was subsequently approved etc.), are:


"removal of trees and scrub outside the breeding bird season or following a check for nesting birds"


It's a small word, 'or', but it does mean something. And at this time of the year, when most trees aren't yet in leaf, it's not difficult to see (or hear) a nest. Not that tree-nesting birds do much nesting before the leaves are out, not even those, like the woodpeckers, that hide their nests in holes. And as for the birds that nest in undergrowth, the robins and goldfinches, for example, they tend to leave it even later, until decent cover of new growth has arisen.


But that shouldn't matter. This is about the discriminate removal of innocent trees, deceptively youthful remnants of the Ancient Great North Wood that stood even as the dinosaurs were grazing Peckham Rye and that provided, with the bounteous generosity of nature, food for King Arthur, forage for King Caractacus and firewood for King Akhnaten, in a callous campaign of brutal tidying by an authoritarian, speciesist council, deaf to the waving of democratic placards, blind to the most arrant shoutiness, and disrespectful in the way they're either robbing the environment of the vital food of corporal recycling, or contrarywise, according to faith, temperament and expedience. In that context, the presence or absence of amorous dicky-birds shouldn't really make much difference. It's the trees (and knotweed) we should be thinking of, and they're being sacrificed, as the evil council has no qualms in admitting, merely to:


"minimise the impact on the adjacent wildlife site, and so as to create glades and increase the area of woodland edge habitat which is valuable in particular to foraging bats, birds, reptiles and invertebrates (for example speckled wood butterfly which prefers dappled shade)"


If my blood wasn't boiling already, that would be enough to set it simmering, and I'm minded to rush to the barricades. If only Poundland sold megaphones.

The council's planning application states very clearly that they will not be removing trees or undergrowth during the bird nesting season:-

http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?casereference=15/AP/3190&system=DC

"Camberwell New Cemetery

Area D1? Planning Application Submission?

Design and Appearance and Access Statement???????July 2015? This report forms part of the planning submission for a proposed scheme to prepare an area of land within Camberwell New Cemetery to be more suitable for burial comprising tree felling, localized ground modeling and surface water drainage, laying out of access paths, and associated seeding, turfing, planting and nature conservation measures.


2.4.7 General Mitigation Procedures are given in the report to include:  removal of trees and scrub outside of bird nesting season;


3.2.13 No trees are to be felled until bat surveys have been undertaken by the clients ecologist (below).? No felling is to take place in bird nesting season.


Bats? 3.2.17 The LWT bat survey reveals bat activity over the site and points to ivy clad trees in and around the site as having moderate potential for bat roosts. These are deemed therefore to include trees at the head of the woodland glade which would be proposed to be removed.??? In accordance with the LWT recommendations:?  vegetation clearance works would only be carried out between mid-September and the 1st November or during April to avoid the bat breeding and hibernation"

?? So that is what the council applied for permission to do & for which permission was granted.

?? As April is within the bird nesting season, the only time they should be undertaking clearance work in the woodland glade is mid-September to the end of October.

LATEST


The Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries, the Save Southwark Woods campaign, has asked people to write to Southwark Council to ask them to stop tree felling immediately ? it?s bird nesting season. And to stop cutting trees for new burial plots, full stop.


Southwark Council is cutting trees in The Glade, Camberwell New Cemetery woodlands on One Tree Hill, over the fence from One Tree Hill Nature Reserve on the Honor Oak Nature Corridor. Write to Ian Wingfield, Sadiq Khan and others. Details at this link:


http://www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk/stop-felling-in-nesting-season/4593735109


ONE TREE HILL SITE(Area D1)


As of last night, the half acre worksite was inactive. We are awaiting tree cutters today. Go to the highest part of Camberwell New Cemetery (260 feet above sea level)and take photos. We will be there at 11AM. Photo attached is from One Tree Hill Local Nature of workmen in Area D1 on New Cemetery land.


We have asked Mr. Wingield for a site visit inside Area B, but also to Area Z in the Old Cemetery, but he has not replied to us.


UNDERHILL ROAD WOOD, CAMBERWELL OLD CEMETERY (Area Z):

As of yesterday afternoon, the site was quiet. We are awating work to restart, stripping the few remaining bits of nature and start mounding over the graves of 48,000 poor Londoners.


OLD NURSERY SITE, CAMBERWELL NEW CEMETERY (Area B)


Southwark Council's planning application has been received by Southwark Council to turn the football pitch sized green land next to Honor Oak Park train station and also in the Honor Oak Nature Corridor (HONC). What an absolute waste of inner London greenspace.


We shall be at The Glade - or whatever it is now - at 11AM today. If you would like to meet with us and see what the Council has wrought on the beautiful hill, please come.


Blanche Cameron

Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries / Save Southwark Woods Campaign

07731 304 966 [email protected]

[www.savesouthwarkwoods.org.uk]

Twitter: @southwarkwoods Facebook: Save Southwark Woods


Friends of Camberwell Cemeteries was founded as Save Southwark Woods in January 2015 to stop the destruction of the woods and graves of Camberwell Old and New Cemeteries.

We are for maintaining recreational activities already taking place on cemetery grounds, such as the Recreation Ground and the Allotments.

We are for preserving the cemeteries as Memorial Park Nature Reserves, like Nunhead or Highgate Cemeteries.

Blanche and Lewis - would be nice to see the latest pictures of the group gathered on site to protest; given the numbers you're talking about and the local support you claim I'm sure there must have been hundreds of people showing the council and church what the local community think.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't you think the cemetery is going to be

> reinvigorated by these works and so will be a

> wonderful place to be buried once they are

> complete?



I preferred them before

These people enjoy their walks. They feel that their walks will be less pleasant once work is done. That is all that this has ever been about. They will clutch at any straw they think might help their cause, but they couldn't really give a shit about birds or dead soldiers, just their walks.


Very selfish bunch.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> These people enjoy their walks. They feel that

> their walks will be less pleasant once work is

> done. That is all that this has ever been about.

> They will clutch at any straw they think might

> help their cause, but they couldn't really give a

> shit about birds or dead soldiers, just their

> walks.

>

> Very selfish bunch.



Think you need to go for a walk, to let off some steam. There used to be a cracking cemetery for that, just off Underhill Road.

fruityloops Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> Think you need to go for a walk, to let off some

> steam. There used to be a cracking cemetery for

> that, just off Underhill Road.



Oh it's still there, are you having trouble seeing it? Should've gone to Specsavers.


Methinks it might more be yourself that needs a calming walk, suffused as you are with righteous indignation at the idea that Blanche, Lewis and the others should be challenged, or that they might not be entirely correct.


As much as I may have disagreed with him on some stuff, I've found Hopone's posts much more informative and useful. I'm not blind to the idea that Southwark Council are a bunch of bar-stewards who will happily ignore their own regulations if it suits them, but the approach of SSW has consistently been one of abusing (literally) anyone who won't fall into line with their dogma. Add to the fact that they really don't seem realistic or balanced in their view of the future of internment, and I find them very hard to get on board with


Hopone on the other hand seems to deal in facts, and will debate. I like debate, it means I might learn something, and from him I have. SSW don't do debate.

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fruityloops Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

>

> >

> > Think you need to go for a walk, to let off

> some

> > steam. There used to be a cracking cemetery

> for

> > that, just off Underhill Road.

>

>

> Oh it's still there, are you having trouble seeing

> it? Should've gone to Specsavers.

>

> Methinks it might more be yourself that needs a

> calming walk, suffused as you are with righteous

> indignation at the idea that Blanche, Lewis and

> the others should be challenged, or that they

> might not be entirely correct.

>

> As much as I may have disagreed with him on some

> stuff, I've found Hopone's posts much more

> informative and useful. I'm not blind to the idea

> that Southwark Council are a bunch of bar-stewards

> who will happily ignore their own regulations if

> it suits them, but the approach of SSW has

> consistently been one of abusing (literally)

> anyone who won't fall into line with their dogma.

> Add to the fact that they really don't seem

> realistic or balanced in their view of the future

> of internment, and I find them very hard to get on

> board with

>

> Hopone on the other hand seems to deal in facts,

> and will debate. I like debate, it means I might

> learn something, and from him I have. SSW don't do

> debate.



It;s there. Just not as cracking as it used to be.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The is very low water pressure in the middle of Friern Road this morning.
    • I think mostly those are related to the same "issues". In my experience, it's difficult using the pin when reporting problems, especially if you're on a mobile... There's two obvious leaks in that stretch and has been for sometime one of them apparently being sewer flooding 😱  
    • BBC Homepage Skip to content Accessibility Help EFor you Notifications More menu Search BBC                     BBC News Menu   UK England N. Ireland Scotland Alba Wales Cymru Isle of Man Guernsey Jersey Local News Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told   Image source,Getty Images ByRichard Bilton, BBC Panorama and Ben Milne, BBC News Published 2 hours ago Vets have told BBC Panorama they feel under increasing pressure to make money for the big companies that employ them - and worry about the costly financial impact on pet owners. Prices charged by UK vets rose by 63% between 2016 and 2023, external, and the government's competition regulator has questioned whether the pet-care market - as it stands - is giving customers value for money. One anonymous vet, who works for the UK's largest vet care provider, IVC Evidensia, said that the company has introduced a new monitoring system that could encourage vets to offer pet owners costly tests and treatment options. A spokesperson for IVC told Panorama: "The group's vets and vet nurses never prioritise revenue or transaction value over and above the welfare of the animal in their care." More than half of all UK households are thought to own a pet, external. Over the past few months, hundreds of pet owners have contacted BBC Your Voice with concerns about vet bills. One person said they had paid £5,600 for 18 hours of vet-care for their pet: "I would have paid anything to save him but felt afterwards we had been taken advantage of." Another described how their dog had undergone numerous blood tests and scans: "At the end of the treatment we were none the wiser about her illness and we were presented with a bill of £13,000."   Image caption, UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024, according to the CMA Mounting concerns over whether pet owners are receiving a fair deal prompted a formal investigation by government watchdog, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA). In a provisional report, external at the end of last year, it identified several issues: Whether vet companies are being transparent about the ownership of individual practices and whether pet owners have enough information about pricing The concentration of vet practices and clinics in the hands of six companies - these now control 60% of the UK's pet-care market Whether this concentration has led to less market competition and allowed some vet care companies to make excess profits 'Hitting targets' A vet, who leads one of IVC's surgeries (and who does not want to be identified because they fear they could lose their job), has shared a new internal document with Panorama. The document uses a colour code to compare the company's UK-wide tests and treatment options and states that it is intended to help staff improve clinical care. It lists key performance indicators in categories that include average sales per patient, X-rays, ultrasound and lab tests. The vet is worried about the new policy: "We will have meetings every month, where one of the area teams will ask you how many blood tests, X-rays and ultrasounds you're doing." If a category is marked in green on the chart, the clinic would be judged to be among the company's top 25% of achievers in the UK. A red mark, on the other hand, would mean the clinic was in the bottom 25%. If this happens, the vet says, it might be asked to come up with a plan of action. The vet says this would create pressure to "upsell" services. Panorama: Why are vet bills so high? Are people being priced out of pet ownership by soaring bills? Watch on BBC iPlayer now or BBC One at 20:00 on Monday 12 January (22:40 in Northern Ireland) Watch on iPlayer For instance, the vet says, under the new model, IVC would prefer any animal with suspected osteoarthritis to potentially be X-rayed. With sedation, that could add £700 to a bill. While X-rays are sometimes necessary, the vet says, the signs of osteoarthritis - the thickening of joints, for instance - could be obvious to an experienced vet, who might prefer to prescribe a less expensive anti-inflammatory treatment. "Vets shouldn't have pressure to do an X-ray because it would play into whether they are getting green on the care framework for their clinic." IVC has told Panorama it is extremely proud of the work its clinical teams do and the data it collects is to "identify and close gaps in care for our patients". It says its vets have "clinical independence", and that prioritising revenue over care would be against the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons' (RCVS) code and IVC policy. Vets say they are under pressure to bring in more money per pet   Published 15 April 2025 Vets should be made to publish prices, watchdog says   Published 15 October 2025 The vet says a drive to increase revenue is undermining his profession. Panorama spoke to more than 30 vets in total who are currently working, or have worked, for some of the large veterinary groups. One recalls being told that not enough blood tests were being taken: "We were pushed to do more. I hated opening emails." Another says that when their small practice was sold to a large company, "it was crazy... It was all about hitting targets". Not all the big companies set targets or monitor staff in this way. The high cost of treatment UK pet owners spent £6.3bn on vet and other pet-care services in 2024 - equal to just over £365 per pet-owning household, according to the CMA. However, most pet owners in the UK do not have insurance, and bills can leave less-well-off families feeling helpless when treatment is needed. Many vets used not to display prices and pet owners often had no clear idea of what treatment would cost, but in the past two years that has improved, according to the CMA. Rob Jones has told Panorama that when his family dog, Betty, fell ill during the autumn of 2024 they took her to an emergency treatment centre, Vets Now, and she underwent an operation that cost almost £5,000. Twelve days later, Betty was still unwell, and Rob says he was advised that she could have a serious infection. He was told a diagnosis - and another operation - would cost between £5,000-£8,000.   Image caption, Betty's owners were told an operation on her would cost £12,000 However, on the morning of the operation, Rob was told this price had risen to £12,000. When he complained, he was quoted a new figure - £10,000. "That was the absolute point where I lost faith in them," he says. "It was like, I don't believe that you've got our interests or Betty's interests at heart." The family decided to put Betty to sleep. Rob did not know at the time that both his local vet, and the emergency centre, branded Vets Now, where Betty was treated, were both owned by the same company - IVC. He was happy with the treatment but complained about the sudden price increase and later received an apology from Vets Now. It offered him £3,755.59 as a "goodwill gesture".   Image caption, Rob Jones says he lost faith in the vets treating his pet dog Betty Vets Now told us its staff care passionately for the animals they treat: "In complex cases, prices can vary depending on what the vet discovers during a consultation, during the treatment, and depending on how the patient responds. "We have reviewed our processes and implemented a number of changes to ensure that conversations about pricing are as clear as possible." Value for money? Independent vet practices have been a popular acquisition for corporate investors in recent years, according to Dr David Reader from the University of Glasgow. He has made a detailed study of the industry. Pet care has been seen as attractive, he says, because of the opportunities "to find efficiencies, to consolidate, set up regional hubs, but also to maximise profits". Six large veterinary groups (sometimes referred to as LVGs) now control 60% of the UK pet care market - up from 10% a decade ago, according to the CMA, external. They are: Linnaeus, which owns 180 practices Medivet, which has 363 Vet Partners with 375 practices CVS Group, which has 387 practices Pets at Home, which has 445 practices under the name Vets for Pets IVC Evidensia, which has 900 practices When the CMA announced its provisional findings last autumn, it said there was not enough competition or informed choice in the market. It estimated the combined cost of this to UK pet owners amounted to £900m between 2020-2024. Corporate vets dispute the £900m figure. They say their prices are competitive and made freely available, and reflect their huge investment in the industry, not to mention rising costs, particularly of drugs. The corporate vets also say customers value their services highly and that they comply with the RCVS guidelines.   Image caption, A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with the service they receive from vets A CMA survey suggests pet owners are happy with their vets - both corporate and independent - when it comes to quality of service. But, with the exception of Pets at Home, customer satisfaction on cost is much lower for the big companies. "I think that large veterinary corporations, particularly where they're owned by private equity companies, are more concerned about profits than professionals who own veterinary businesses," says Suzy Hudson-Cooke from the British Veterinary Union, which is part of Unite. Proposals for change The CMA's final report on the vet industry is expected by the spring but no date has been set for publication. In its provisional report, it proposed improved transparency on pricing and vet ownership. Companies would have to reveal if vet practices were part of a chain, and whether they had business connections with hospitals, out-of-hours surgeries, online pharmacies and even crematoria. IVC, CVS and Vet Partners all have connected businesses and would have to be more transparent about their services in the future. Pets at Home does not buy practices - it works in partnership with individual vets, as does Medivet. These companies have consistently made clear in their branding who owns their practices. The big companies say they support moves to make the industry more transparent so long as they don't put too high a burden on vets. David Reader says the CMA proposals could have gone further. "There's good reason to think that once this investigation is concluded, some of the larger veterinary groups will continue with their acquisition strategies." The CMA says its proposals would "improve competition by helping pet owners choose the right vet, the right treatment, and the right way to buy medicine - without confusion or unnecessary cost". For Rob Jones, however, it is probably too late. "I honestly wouldn't get another pet," he says. "I think it's so expensive now and the risk financially is so great.             Food Terms of Use About the BBC Privacy Policy Cookies Accessibility Help Parental Guidance Contact the BBC Make an editorial complaint BBC emails for you Copyright © 2026 BBC. The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites. Read about our approach to external linking.
    • What does the area with the blue dotted lines and the crossed out water drop mean? No water in this area? So many leaks in the area.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...