Jump to content

Recommended Posts

At the end of November, severe vibration during the demolition of the old Lordship Lane police station site caused some cracking in brickwork in our house in Landcroft Road.


We approached Farrans, the developer, for help with the cost of putting it right but they have refused to give a satisfactory response to numerous emails.


It looks like they are hoping we will go away because we are not immediate neighbours and so not covered by the party wall legislation.


My solicitor has asked me to find out if anyone else has been affected by the demolition or building work, hence my appeal here. If you have, please private message me and/or let us know your experience here.


Thanks, Steve

Hi Steve,

About a month ago I knocked on immediate neighbours of the new primary school site asking about any such problems and was delighted at how positive those immediate neighbours were with how things progressing and how responsive the building contractors have been. I hasten to add one had had issues arise but the description of how they were dealt with was very reassuring.


So please feel free to email me any issues to see if I can help resolve them.

Thanks, James, I shall email you in a moment.


Our experience has been that the site manager was pleasant and cooperative, but other than his acknowledgement of our emails, we have been ignored for three months now by anyone higher up in the company. That includes their managing director, other directors and some directors of Harris Federation, who commissioned Farrans for this work.


Regards, Steve

landsberger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You could always try Harris corporately...


Thanks for the suggestion, landsberger, but we did copy a couple of Harris Federation directors into some of our emails to Farrans, but they did not respond either. Perhaps one still has to write 'proper' letters to be taken seriously, but in these days one does expect companies to be a bit lighter on their feet, especially because Farrans' publicity trumpets that they belong to the 'Considerate Constructors Scheme'. This now seems to us to be mere PR window-dressing as 'Protecting the local environment' (part of the scheme's code of practice) doesn't appear to extend to nearby neighbours!

I do not have property affected but nevertheless concerned that there is no nightime red warning light atop the crane on this Whateley Road site, either through a dark cloudy night or dismal misty morn, is this even legal? From my terrace I can see 6 crane lights in the distance but none of the crane before us. This morning especially, thick mist and cloud, helicopters take note.

Hmm... We have just had an email from Farrans saying that the responsible company is called Mace Group, which appears to have been the contractor to Farrans all along.


It has only taken them nearly 3 months to find a person in the Mace Group who should be communicating with us! We are not holding our breath :)

I'm sorry to hear that your property has been damaged by this work, but should you not be making a claim from your buildings insurers rather than trying to pursue the developers yourself? It would then be up to your insurance company to sort out the cause of the damage, and to help you in getting the repair work carried out.

@Growlybear, you are right in the normal course of events but there are some additional circumstances to the costs we are incurring, which I don't want to set out in public, that our insurance won't fully cover. It would be small change and not a big deal to the developer to put us back in the situation we would have been if the damage had not been caused and we had hoped that their proclamations of being a 'considerate constructor' would mean that they would be responsive to our issues.


As a result of our appeal for information two other neighbours have been in touch with us with similar experiences.

I wish you luck Steve - and personally don't doubt that the damage could have been caused by the vibration - but with SE22 being a known subsidence black spot it might be difficult to prove and to compensate a group will potentially become public knowledge and lead to a flood of further claims - you might actually be in a stronger position on a sole claim, they will never admit liability but might be inclined to settle with one person.
If you can get more people to contact the company then they might anmit they have a problem, if its just one person then they might say no one else as contacted us about this matter. I wish you luck and get more people or any photos that show that there was no damage on the property before the work. Also if its outside then try Google Maps as that has a date and clear photos of your property.
@Mick Mac and @kibris - thanks, both for the suggestions. It's not clear at the moment whether a campaign or a softly-softly approach will work best. It will now depend on the quality of the response from Mace. HOWEVER, the Streetview suggestion was brilliant, kibris. The photo, which is from 6 months before, clearly shows that there was no crack at that time.

First off, approach them on your own if you have time and confidence, try and get in touch with their legal team; don't explicitly say you want to take legal action (I don't know what your costs are, if under ?5k small claims court).


Sometime a well, strongly worded letter (not email) sent recorded delivery referencing the relevant statutes can work wonders.


Otherwise make sure your solicitor is a good one. Good luck.

  • 2 weeks later...

Just updating, as promised... The structural engineer assessed the cracking on Friday. His conclusion was that it was too minor to worry about or worth pursuing the developers over.


However, it doesn't change the fact that Farrans (and Mace, from whom we have still not heard) have badly managed our attempts to complain!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks to all for the comments and advice.  I have now reported the incident to the police.
    • Thanks everyone for your comments, all of which I’ve taken something from. I originally posted to warn and help others learn from my experience – hence the title, first and last words of the post. However, the process of posting and reading your comments has helped me better make sense of what felt ‘off’ about the incident, why and what I’d do differently next time. I hadn’t expected this outcome, so thank you.  It’s also yielded several ‘golden nugget’ insights, one of which I share here for others. For context, I’m a longtime SE22 resident, who lives on a street with a primary school, so am used to scooting, cycling, walking with buggies, small children, pets etc. I like where I live and have never been struck on a pavement by anyone, on wheels or otherwise. I’ve been fortunate. When walking down Carlton Avenue towards Dulwich Village yesterday, I was on the left-hand side of the pavement but – ‘golden nugget’ approaching – not as close to people’s front garden walls as I could have been. The cyclist came from behind and overtook on the inside i.e. passed between me and the wall. The gap was too narrow and he hit my leg. For clarity, my original post was about the lack of adult supervision of a child. There’s been much comment here about the cyclist’s age. I didn’t know he was 4, until his father told me. I felt that this was a tactic – along with telling me I was over-reacting, talking about intent, apologising undercut with ‘but’ and laughing – to downplay and avoid taking responsibility for his part in the situation. But I accept that is my perception, readers weren’t there and may think differently. What also felt ‘off’ is that the father didn’t see what happened or ask any questions to find out. What happened? Where did he hit you? How hard? Are you alright? Is my son alright? Is everyone alright? This sounds obvious but wasn’t to me until last night. Back to age. Is the age of the cyclist important? If you consider it from the perspective of a four-year-old, it might be. He’s on his bike, helmet on, speeding along, sees a gap and thinks he can get through it. He doesn’t know and/or may never have been told about the risks (to himself and others) of undertaking on the left. Hits pedestrian. I was not expecting to be hit from behind or the undertaking. But had I walked closer to the wall – and not left a potentially inviting gap – this probably wouldn’t have happened. This is just one ‘golden nugget’ I will take away. It’s something I can easily do, doesn’t depend on anyone else doing anything differently, and could contribute towards keeping myself and others safe. All in all, posting here has been unexpectedly useful for me. I hope for others, too. I feel able to move forward with learnings, so thank you guys.
    • Scorpio Dry Cleaners (in the parade of shops at the top of Herne Hill) has closed. The shopfront is being renovated and will be reopened as therapy rooms by Herne Hill Space.  I take this as evidence that we're all more stressed than before, despite being more casually dressed...
    • They do often have very small turning circles (is that the correct term?)  though. Many many moons ago I won a very long Volvo estate car. It could get into a space not much longer than itself, which  was impressive!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...