Jump to content

Is criminalising membership in the banned group Islam4UK really necessary...

Ladymuck

By Ladymuck
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shhh careful what you say reggie, they might put

> one of those things that they put on Salmon

> Rushdee...........Do'h



D'oh indeed!


Now, Mr. T...re:


Posted by: SteveT Today, 12:54PM

I have yet to find it beneficial to my cause, to have the law on my side reggie.


Erm...what "cause" would that be?


*awaits response with impatience*

reggie

reggie

Posted
Posted

SteveT

I have just googled fatwa and found that they are rarely bad and are mostly clarifications of Islamic law made by an Islamic scholar.

I am confident that if a fatwa was issued to Sly and Reggie it would be....'turn it up'

Some music

reggie

reggie

Posted
Posted

I also read this in wikipedia


"In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that Iran shall never acquire these weapons."

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

reggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I also read this in wikipedia

>

> "In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of

> Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa

> that the production, stockpiling and use of

> nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that

> Iran shall never acquire these weapons."



*huge burst of laughter*


You've just reminded me of that fabulous comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her name)...she commented once that "the British" always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and then went on to say that she couldn't understand why...distinguishing between the two countries was easy...she said:


Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass destruction!


(Well I found that funny).

katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:



> *huge burst of laughter*

>

> You've just reminded me of that fabulous

> comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her

> name)...she commented once that "the British"

> always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and

> then went on to say that she couldn't understand

> why...distinguishing between the two countries was

> easy...she said:

>

> Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass

> destruction!

>

> (Well I found that funny).


Shappi Khorsandi - and yes I found that line hilarious too. She is totally brilliant, clever and funny.

I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its just giving them a false sense of importance and credence....having lived overseas, I really do value the freedom of speech in the UK!

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...Off

> topic I know, but still.....



It's OK...you are allowed to go "off topic" in the Lounge (the main reason why I didn't post this in the Drawing Room!!).

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky grin*



katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its

> just giving them a false sense of importance and

> credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> value the freedom of speech in the UK!


katie1997, where were you living...and was the "freedom" very different?


OK...floor's all yours again reggie...

katie1997

katie1997

Posted
Posted

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky

> grin*

>

>

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I think criminalising the membership is wrong,

> its

> > just giving them a false sense of importance

> and

> > credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> > value the freedom of speech in the UK!

>

> katie1997, where were you living...and was the

> "freedom" very different?

>

> OK...floor's all yours again reggie...



Saudi, India, and yes it definitely has a different feel in the UK/West....we take soooo much for granted I think (not intentionally I just feel differently by my overseas experiences and appreciate more the fact we can peacefully protest, say what we think, dress how we like, do what we want) :)


*gives floor back to reggie again*

Ladymuck

Ladymuck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> LM, good thread btw.



I know...can't remember what it's about though...oh dear I've a dreadful feeling I might have a PM in my inbox from Admin. tomorrow morning...feel so tiddly...oh dear oh dear...what did I Have to drink? Must have been the crisps...yeah definitely the crisps...how many packets did I consume? Ummm they were good though...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • march46
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By march46 · Posted

      Big Bellies didn’t have permission.  
    • CP_ED
      Application for Londis Off-Licence next to Charter East Entrance

      By CP_ED · Posted

      Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • teddyboy23
      New Empanada Place on LL

      By teddyboy23 · Posted

      The lady is called Janet 
    • FellbriggSam
      Tree Killer – Seeking Advice on Dealing with Toxic Neighbours

      By FellbriggSam · Posted

      He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...