Jump to content

Is criminalising membership in the banned group Islam4UK really necessary...


Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shhh careful what you say reggie, they might put

> one of those things that they put on Salmon

> Rushdee...........Do'h



D'oh indeed!


Now, Mr. T...re:


Posted by: SteveT Today, 12:54PM

I have yet to find it beneficial to my cause, to have the law on my side reggie.


Erm...what "cause" would that be?


*awaits response with impatience*

SteveT

I have just googled fatwa and found that they are rarely bad and are mostly clarifications of Islamic law made by an Islamic scholar.

I am confident that if a fatwa was issued to Sly and Reggie it would be....'turn it up'

Some music

I also read this in wikipedia


"In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that Iran shall never acquire these weapons."

reggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I also read this in wikipedia

>

> "In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of

> Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa

> that the production, stockpiling and use of

> nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that

> Iran shall never acquire these weapons."



*huge burst of laughter*


You've just reminded me of that fabulous comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her name)...she commented once that "the British" always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and then went on to say that she couldn't understand why...distinguishing between the two countries was easy...she said:


Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass destruction!


(Well I found that funny).

Ladymuck Wrote:



> *huge burst of laughter*

>

> You've just reminded me of that fabulous

> comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her

> name)...she commented once that "the British"

> always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and

> then went on to say that she couldn't understand

> why...distinguishing between the two countries was

> easy...she said:

>

> Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass

> destruction!

>

> (Well I found that funny).


Shappi Khorsandi - and yes I found that line hilarious too. She is totally brilliant, clever and funny.

I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its just giving them a false sense of importance and credence....having lived overseas, I really do value the freedom of speech in the UK!

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...Off

> topic I know, but still.....



It's OK...you are allowed to go "off topic" in the Lounge (the main reason why I didn't post this in the Drawing Room!!).

Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky grin*



katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its

> just giving them a false sense of importance and

> credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> value the freedom of speech in the UK!


katie1997, where were you living...and was the "freedom" very different?


OK...floor's all yours again reggie...

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky

> grin*

>

>

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I think criminalising the membership is wrong,

> its

> > just giving them a false sense of importance

> and

> > credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> > value the freedom of speech in the UK!

>

> katie1997, where were you living...and was the

> "freedom" very different?

>

> OK...floor's all yours again reggie...



Saudi, India, and yes it definitely has a different feel in the UK/West....we take soooo much for granted I think (not intentionally I just feel differently by my overseas experiences and appreciate more the fact we can peacefully protest, say what we think, dress how we like, do what we want) :)


*gives floor back to reggie again*

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> LM, good thread btw.



I know...can't remember what it's about though...oh dear I've a dreadful feeling I might have a PM in my inbox from Admin. tomorrow morning...feel so tiddly...oh dear oh dear...what did I Have to drink? Must have been the crisps...yeah definitely the crisps...how many packets did I consume? Ummm they were good though...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...