Jump to content

Is criminalising membership in the banned group Islam4UK really necessary...


Recommended Posts

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shhh careful what you say reggie, they might put

> one of those things that they put on Salmon

> Rushdee...........Do'h



D'oh indeed!


Now, Mr. T...re:


Posted by: SteveT Today, 12:54PM

I have yet to find it beneficial to my cause, to have the law on my side reggie.


Erm...what "cause" would that be?


*awaits response with impatience*

SteveT

I have just googled fatwa and found that they are rarely bad and are mostly clarifications of Islamic law made by an Islamic scholar.

I am confident that if a fatwa was issued to Sly and Reggie it would be....'turn it up'

Some music

I also read this in wikipedia


"In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that Iran shall never acquire these weapons."

reggie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I also read this in wikipedia

>

> "In 2005, the Leader of the Islamic Republic of

> Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa

> that the production, stockpiling and use of

> nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that

> Iran shall never acquire these weapons."



*huge burst of laughter*


You've just reminded me of that fabulous comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her name)...she commented once that "the British" always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and then went on to say that she couldn't understand why...distinguishing between the two countries was easy...she said:


Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass destruction!


(Well I found that funny).

Ladymuck Wrote:



> *huge burst of laughter*

>

> You've just reminded me of that fabulous

> comedienne from Iran (sorry forgotten her

> name)...she commented once that "the British"

> always seemed to get Iraq and Iran confused...and

> then went on to say that she couldn't understand

> why...distinguishing between the two countries was

> easy...she said:

>

> Iran is the country WITH the weapons of mass

> destruction!

>

> (Well I found that funny).


Shappi Khorsandi - and yes I found that line hilarious too. She is totally brilliant, clever and funny.

I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its just giving them a false sense of importance and credence....having lived overseas, I really do value the freedom of speech in the UK!

northlondoner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>...Off

> topic I know, but still.....



It's OK...you are allowed to go "off topic" in the Lounge (the main reason why I didn't post this in the Drawing Room!!).

Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky grin*



katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I think criminalising the membership is wrong, its

> just giving them a false sense of importance and

> credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> value the freedom of speech in the UK!


katie1997, where were you living...and was the "freedom" very different?


OK...floor's all yours again reggie...

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry to interrupt you a minute reggie *cheeky

> grin*

>

>

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I think criminalising the membership is wrong,

> its

> > just giving them a false sense of importance

> and

> > credence....having lived overseas, I really do

> > value the freedom of speech in the UK!

>

> katie1997, where were you living...and was the

> "freedom" very different?

>

> OK...floor's all yours again reggie...



Saudi, India, and yes it definitely has a different feel in the UK/West....we take soooo much for granted I think (not intentionally I just feel differently by my overseas experiences and appreciate more the fact we can peacefully protest, say what we think, dress how we like, do what we want) :)


*gives floor back to reggie again*

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> LM, good thread btw.



I know...can't remember what it's about though...oh dear I've a dreadful feeling I might have a PM in my inbox from Admin. tomorrow morning...feel so tiddly...oh dear oh dear...what did I Have to drink? Must have been the crisps...yeah definitely the crisps...how many packets did I consume? Ummm they were good though...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But I don't think that was what you meant, was it? But he can hardly be held responsible for what somebody else did!
    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...