Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there


Just looking for a bit of advice - I employ my nanny two days a week, Mon and Tues and have been told that on this basis she is entitled to 11.6 days holiday per annum. I was advised that some nannies include bank holidays in this entitlement but some don't...at first I was all for giving bank hols as additional but obv this works out to around 15 days hols per year (as she works for me on a Monday) which seems an awful lot (in that if you pro-rated it it'd be more than 30 days a year) so now I just don't know what to do (as she has said she wants BH as additional)


Also, we're in a share (with two others) so how an earth do you work out your Nanny's holidays (i.e.deciding when we're on holiday so nanny not needed) so that it's fair for all - nanny and parents.


Have just sorted the nightmare of tax and NI for her but this is one thing that I just don't know how to go about


Any advice much appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9541-nanny-holidays/
Share on other sites

This may answer your questions regarding holidays and bank holidays. Bank holidays are included in holidays, they are not additional.


With regards to everyone's holidays, all the families just have to have very open communication with each other and your nanny about when it is taken. With our nanny/previous nanny shares half of the nanny's holidays were our holidays (we decided when she would be off) and the other half was when she wanted to take them.


Hope that helps.

We did the same as CandJ - half of the holidays were chosen by the nanny and half by us. With regards to the share bit - we tried to co-ordinate the 'main holiday' with the share (and with the nanny, so it all tied in), and then on the times where only one family was on holiday, they got to have a 'fee break' for those days, whilst the solo family picked up the cost of paying the nanny on a sole charge rate. Whilst there are reasons this might not be fair, (if one family has lots more hols) we found that actually, the child who was at home got to have the sole care for a few days, so it seemed reasonable to pay more.

Hi there

If you want to do the statutory minimum the legal position is that you take the full time amount they are entitled to of 28 days (being 20 days hol plus 8 bank hols) and then multiply by 2/5. Any other employer would presumably then give her 3/5 of the 28 and therefore she gets the full entitlement over all

It's a difficult year because 7 of the bank holidays fall on a monday and tuesday

Angela

It is very bad luck to be in a nannyshare on a Monday, because as you point out, most bank holidays fall on a Monday, and especially if you only have two days a week. Then if bank holidays are on top of holidays, you end up with not very many days childcare and lots to pay for, compared to the other families with the Wednesdays and Thursdays! We had this problem too for one of the families we shared with. But because work for all families was slightly flexible, we worked out a way to share the bummer Mondays, in a mixture of trading a couple of days, and also dividing up the number of bank holidays between us, and all paying towards them.

What you need to do regarding the Bank Holidays mostly falling on Mondays issue it to add them (pro-rated) to the 'regular' entitlement.


So, say the nanny works for you 2 days a week and is entitled to the statutory minimum a year), that's 8 days 'regular' holiday (20/5)*2), plus 3.2 Bank Holidays (two fifths of the 8 Bank holidays she's entitled to).


So, let's round up and say it's 11.5 days holiday in total a year. But.......every time a Bank Holiday falls on a Monday (and she doesn't work), you knock a day off the overall entitlement. So in a year when 7 of the 8 fall on a Monday, that means she'll actually only have 4.5 'regular' holiday days to use for the year (11.5 minus 7). Sounds a bit mean, but if her other employer takes into account Bank Holidays in the same way, she'll get a 4.5 day Bank Holiday entitlement plus 12 days regular entitlement, and of those 16.5 days (giving her a total of 28 days across the two families), only one day will be taken on an actual bank holiday, giving her 15.5 regular days.


Essentially, the only fair way round it is to lump all the different kinds of holiday in as one. Once you know what the whole year's entitlement for your family is, you just need to make sure you deduct a days holiday every Monday or Tuesday she has off, regardless of whether it's a Bank Hol or regular holiday.


Hope that helps.

littleEDfamily Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What you need to do regarding the Bank Holidays

> mostly falling on Mondays issue it to add them

> (pro-rated) to the 'regular' entitlement.

>

> So, say the nanny works for you 2 days a week and

> is entitled to the statutory minimum a year),

> that's 8 days 'regular' holiday (20/5)*2), plus

> 3.2 Bank Holidays (two fifths of the 8 Bank

> holidays she's entitled to).

>

> So, let's round up and say it's 11.5 days holiday

> in total a year. But.......every time a Bank

> Holiday falls on a Monday (and she doesn't work),

> you knock a day off the overall entitlement. So in

> a year when 7 of the 8 fall on a Monday, that

> means she'll actually only have 4.5 'regular'

> holiday days to use for the year (11.5 minus 7).

> Sounds a bit mean, but if her other employer takes

> into account Bank Holidays in the same way, she'll

> get a 4.5 day Bank Holiday entitlement plus 12

> days regular entitlement, and of those 16.5 days

> (giving her a total of 28 days across the two

> families), only one day will be taken on an actual

> bank holiday, giving her 15.5 regular days.

>

> Essentially, the only fair way round it is to lump

> all the different kinds of holiday in as one. Once

> you know what the whole year's entitlement for

> your family is, you just need to make sure you

> deduct a days holiday every Monday or Tuesday she

> has off, regardless of whether it's a Bank Hol or

> regular holiday.

>

> Hope that helps.



LittleED family is entirely right - it is perfectly acceptable (and in fact the norm with most employers in all sectors) that the entitlement to bank holidays is also pro-rata. So if there are 8 bank holidays a year, your nanny is only entitled to 2/5 of that allowance - add this to her pro rata holiday allowance and if she chooses to work no bank holidays, you deduct the number that occur on a Monday from her total holiday entitlement.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...