Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hopefully this is the right forum - and I'm sure this isnt a unique situation.


Does anyone have any tips on handling a romance with a single mum of a three year old - especially when it comes to valuable adult time alone.


Babysitting agencies tend to be horrifically expensive. Relatives are all a fair distance away and so the only real date-night option tends to be other parents from school. Obviously there's a bit of quid pro quo involved - and anyway, there's a limit to how often one rely on that option. Help! A lifetime of watching Holby on a Saturday night beckons menacingly.


Also: When is it ok for the little one to find the "boyfriend" sitting perkily at the breakfast table ( having woken up absurdly early to avoid being caught in bed) ? I fear it could prove nerve wracking for everyone involved. Any suggestions from either side of the gender divide gratefully received.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/9601-romancing-the-single-mum/
Share on other sites

As the single mum of a three year old I am qualified to answer as I have similar issues when it comes to dating - you could offer to pay half of babysitting fee (am sure you do anyway) so you can go out and don't use those agencies, they are horrifically expensive (am assuming she doesn't do overnights with her Dad if he still in the picture)...I use local au pairs (when friends and family not available) who are much cheaper and really lovely - PM if you want details.


And once the little girl is in bed you can make a romantic evening even if not going out - take over some yummy food, good wine, candles and cook for her...as a single mum having someone prepare a meal is a real luxury


As for the last query - God, I don't know...introductions to children only come when you are pretty far into the relationship and only when both of you think it may be serious - that's just my view others may disagree.


Good luck!

We use an agency called Sitters. It's really good and not unreasonable (well I don't think so). You pay ?12 a quarter to teh agency. Then ?5-75 or so an hour direct to the sitter whenever you use her. It's worth checking out. We've used them a few times now and have been really happy with them.


They are nationwide too so if you're staying somewhere else in the country you can book a sitter local to wherever you are.

northlondoner,


re being found sitting at the kitchen table for breakfast, I would be inclined to think that a 3 year old would pretty much take it in their stride, as long as you and Mum just acted 'normal'.


Of course this will need to be when Mum feels she is ready, and in the longer term questions may be asked, but you can always say you had a 'sleepover' and leave it at that until more questions are asked (does the settee look comfy??!!)!


Hope the cooking is going well, there are also people who will come in and cook a meal for you in your own home - so you could get the restaurant feel without having to go out - might be fun. Also I think anything that would fall under the 'pampering' remit would probably go down well, whether it be offering to take the 3 year old to the park one morning so Mum can have time to herself (or while she gets a surprise massage/pedicure/manicure or whatever that you have arranged), or surprising her with a big soaky bath to enjoy!


Oh, this is all making me feel the need to be romanced again, better have a word with my hubby LOL!!! ;-)


Molly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...