Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Apologies if I've missed a thread but has anyone more info. on Le Chandelier set to open in a couple of weeks? It's next to Cafe Noodle and opposite Mrs. Robinson - chap decorating said it was going to be an antique shop/ tearoom/restaurant (it will be licensed) ... from my limited glimpse it looks kind of rococo swanky.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/962-le-chandelier/
Share on other sites

ounds a bit like the original Franklins on walworth Rd. Anyone remember that? the old higgledy piggledy antique shop where you'd stumble upon the fab restaurant in the basement. Eating Sunday lunch at the table while people perused the antiques surrounding you.

When the antiques shop closed down the restaurant moved and became what is now Franklins on LL.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/962-le-chandelier/#findComment-24547
Share on other sites

Think they should stick to one or two things and do them well. Small businesses tend to over-stretch themselves by doing loads of things haphazardly... the result is a confused loss-making mishmash. Personally I reckon a tea & chandelier shop is a fantastic idea (a few nice cakes on the side would be perfect). As long as they stick to this it should do very well. Good luck to them, I hope it succeeds!
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/962-le-chandelier/#findComment-24757
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Let them go bust.  Enact emergency legislation to ensure that the water still flows and the rest of the network operates. Why should we care what happens to the investors.  Have no idea could or would this work, and where next. And the workers will still be needed whoever runs the show.
    • I think you might mean 'repossession' rather than 'reprocessing'.  
    • I think this is a bit of a myth.  It's true that some of the current owners are pension funds (chiefly the Ontario Universities') but they're global outfits, big enough to know what they're about. As for ordinary UK pension funds, they mostly invest in publicly-tradeable stocks, which Thames no longer is (it's a private limited company, not a PLC), so even those that lazily track the markets by buying everything in the index won't be exposed as Thames isn't in any index. In other words, it's a lot less complicated than Thames, the Government or innumerable consultancies and PR outfits would like you to believe. In case, incidentally, the idea of a cooperative offends any delicate Thatcherite sensibilities, I'd argue that it fits the Thatcherite vision of a stakeholding democracy much better than selling tradeable shares to the public very cheaply. The public, despite their blessable cottons, are too easily tempted by the small but easy win (which is how they sold off their own building societies, preparing the ground for the credit crunch and then the crash) and, as became obvious after every privatisation before or since, their modest stakes inevitably end up in the hands of financial engineers whose only priority is to siphon off the assets and leave the husk to either go bankrupt or get "rescued" by the taxpayers (who thus get to pay twice for nothing). The root of that is the concept of "limited liability" which makes it all possible, but even the most nauseating free-market optimist would struggle to predict the demise of that.  
    • Repossession? Oh no, that's really sad 😢 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...