Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> brum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > ...blimey, and I thought I had just imagined

> > it...! ;-)

>

>

> Nope...I was there...it happened...



You'll be saying she sat on my lap next. You lot have such vivid imaginations.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> brum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

>

> > You'll be saying she sat on my lap next. You

> lot

> > have such vivid imaginations.

>

>

> No, that was somebody else...a different

> occasion...if I recall correctly!!!


No LM, I don't think you do recall correctly!

karter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you naughty brum, you enjoyed LadyM's slaps

> too.:))



Yes! And well deserved were those slaps!!! But brum, you are beginning to sound like a right little sex-pot as well as a masochist!



*curled up laughing*

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> > No, that was somebody else...a different

> > occasion...if I recall correctly!!!

>

> No LM, I don't think you do recall correctly!


Sorry brum...there were other...shall we call them "witnesses"...your senile dementia is getting worse



*now rolling about on floor*

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > you naughty brum, you enjoyed LadyM's slaps

> > too.:))

>

>

> Yes I did. Can't deny that! Ok, err, moving

> on......(please)



Oh my Lawd...you weren't supposed to enjoy them!!!

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KalamityKel Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > well if you will start a thread on such a

> > subject...

>

> Quite...let's just say...you had it coming...


well, this is the naughty room isn't it...

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well if you will start a thread on such a

> subject...



A bit harsh Kel. I mean, it wasn't as if it was me doing anything naughty... I was an innocent passer-by....! I feel my reputation has been sullied by the other suggestions... by the way, did you really drop your earring under the table??? ;-)

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> A bit harsh Kel. I mean, it wasn't as if it was me

> doing anything naughty... I was an innocent

> passer-by....!


We know brum...KK was only teasing...



I feel my reputation has been

> sullied by the other suggestions...


I was just teasing too...sorry if I offended


but you did enjoy the slaps though...


*grins very mischievously*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Wow I had no idea they give you 5% in perfume for your accommodation. You're right, I need to travel more. 
    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...