Jump to content

Recommended Posts

People lose and break their phones much more often than they are mugged for them. If that type of thing never happens to you then fair play. In my twenties (which are becoming a distant memory) I feel like we were all breaking and losing phones. Probably correlated to the alcohol consumption.

I prefer a landline if the option is there.


The simple pleasures of not going through a tunnel, having to ask someone to go somewhere less windy, being low on battery, calling someone back when you lose connection, having a train tannoy in the background, hearing someone buy chewing gum whilst talking to you .. should not be underestimated.

Mobiles aren't that pleasant to hold to your ear either. They're optimised for looking at, not speaking and listening on. Anything over a quick, functional conversation? Not nice.


I suppose I could get a hands free, but in here London I'm concerned that people might not be able to tell whether I'm talking on a hands free .. or suffering from a mental illness.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I prefer a landline if the option is there.

>

> The simple pleasures of not going through a

> tunnel, having to ask someone to go somewhere less

> windy, being low on battery, calling someone back

> when you lose connection, having a train tannoy in

> the background, hearing someone buy chewing gum

> whilst talking to you .. should not be

> underestimated.



But you can't use a landline while you're going through a tunnel or in a station, and with a cordless phone the battery still runs down on long calls, at least mine does.


I think on balance I'm persuaded to keep it, though, even though I hardly use it, particularly as I'm highly unlikely to move to V*rgin broadband.


ETA: Couldn't understand why I couldn't post this until I realised it contained a BAD WORD :))

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But you can't use a landline while you're going

> > through a tunnel or in a station,

>

> Exactly!




So not sure what your point is?!




>

> and with a

> > cordless phone the battery still runs down on

> long

> > calls, at least mine does.

>

> New Batteries.




Yeh probably,it's a very old phone (well, two connected phones)

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> and with a cordless phone the battery still runs down on long

> > calls, at least mine does.

>

> New Batteries.


If you are lucky, they'll take standard rechargeable AAA's, which you can buy in most supermarkets or from eBay. If not, try sticking the make/model number into eBay.


My cordless is 10 years old - stuck new batteries in about 18 months ago and it's like new again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am no expert, but are your photos not saved in Google or similar, as well as being on your physical  phone? If so, you should just be able to access them on your new phone without actually having to move them over? Same with emails, normally, you just have to sign into your email account on your new phone to access them? Not sure re contacts, but I don't recall having any problems when getting a new phone. And apps you can just reinstall. Google or something like ChatGPT could probably "talk" you through sorting, deleting and editing photos and emails, if you can't find someone to help (sorry I can't, I'd be too worried about doing something wrong!) Good luck! Don't delete anything from your old phone until you are sure it's on your new phone!
    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...