Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I am probably very late to this, but I see that the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been approved: http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&keyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563201


Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I couldn't see plans to make the station handicap accessible. That can't be correct, is it?

LD929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am probably very late to this, but I see that

> the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been

> approved:

> http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk:8190/online-appl

> ications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=details&k

> eyVal=_STHWR_DCAPR_9563201

>

> Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I

> couldn't see plans to make the station handicap

> accessible. That can't be correct, is it?


Shouldn't that be 'disabled access' as noted in the Equality Act 2010 (formerly the Disability Discrimination Act 1995).

LD929 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am probably very late to this, but I see that

> the redevelopment of peckham rye station has been

> approved. Maybe I can't read the drawings correctly, but I

> couldn't see plans to make the station handicap

> accessible. That can't be correct, is it?


You're right. It's not there. This is the result of one of many sleights of hand from the Council to recover from their disastrous approach to the station site planning during 2012/13 which led to the notorious Weston Williamson plan to demolish everything and build 5-7 storey housing blocks and clear out all the businesses alongside and behind the station at once: http://www.peckhamvision.org/wiki/Peckham_Rye_Station_Gateway/Jan-Sep_2014#Network_Rail_plans_reveal_total_demolition_18th_January_2014

They then said they would 'codesign' it with local people (just before the 2014 local elections). But then two years of obfuscation since then has resulted in a plan for the new square being approved with no relationship to all the other integral parts of it - this includes step free access for the station, and design of the public realm in the immediately adjoining streets! All objections that the details of the related parts of the station site had to be part of a whole have been brushed aside by the Council to give planning permission. All the other parts are probably being dealt with behind the scenes but in spite of the promise to 'codesign' the station site, no one knows anything. How well they fit together or when remains to be seen. This is how the Planning system operates now unfortunately.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I have a very stupid question. I want to get a SIM card to put in an old mobile as a back up,  in case despite my best efforts my mobile gets stolen and I have no way of contacting anybody quickly, eg banks. Can I just buy any old cheap pay as you go  SIM card and put say ten pounds on it and it will then be fine for years (with the phone kept charged!) even if I don't use it, or do I have to use the phone  every so often to keep the SIM card valid?
    • I hate to see trees cut down to such an unfinished state. Unless the tree is home to wildlife, an effort should be made to remove & replace. Otherwise, it's just so useless & unsightly.
    • Given the level of care in Dulwich Park, I would not expect this to be careless or unnecessary. It will grow back.
    • Quite a number of us who visit the park have wondered the same thing. Also, since a lovely tree in Peckham park was almost mistakenly cut down, the confidence in the council is not 100%
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...