Jump to content

Recommended Posts

ED - NAGAIUTB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa - derailing threads since 2007.

>

> Long may her ban continue.


Nice bit of goading their, cba to rise to it though. Guessing you haven't read any of the above in response to the other usual suspects who derail multiple threads and get away with it. I suggest you take a peak at the 'new shops' thread in general issues. The likes of *Bob* are once again successfully disguising trolling as sarcasm and banter.


Louisa.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

The likes of *Bob* are once again

> successfully disguising trolling as sarcasm and

> banter.

>

> Louisa.



Fully agree, Lou, *Bob* is and always has been a bully and troll disguising it as sarcasm and banter, although often times its quite nasty.

Again, anonymous Admin continuing making things personal, and completely allowing their clique pals to get away with it time and again. Oh, and the ganging up on pensioner Foxy is just nastily bizarre to say the least.

Grok Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> The likes of *Bob* are once again

> > successfully disguising trolling as sarcasm and

> > banter.

> >

> > Louisa.

>

>

> Fully agree, Lou, *Bob* is and always has been a

> bully and troll disguising it as sarcasm and

> banter, although often times its quite nasty.

> Again, anonymous Admin continuing making things

> personal, and completely allowing their clique

> pals to get away with it time and again. Oh, and

> the ganging up on pensioner Foxy is just nastily

> bizarre to say the least.


Im not actually a 'Pensioner' I have several years to go to be officially a 'Pensioner'

I am not offially retired.. I was made redundant at 56.. so I am technically unemployed ..

.. but have never sought work or been on benifits..


Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>


>

> The Fox does not need to be narcissistic... People

> just keep talking about Him.. ;-)

>



Foxy for God!

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > DulwichFox Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

>

> >

> > The Fox does not need to be narcissistic...

> People

> > just keep talking about Him.. ;-)

> >

>

>

> Foxy for God!



I dont believe in God..


I don't believe in magic

I don't believe in I-ching

I don't believe in Bible

I don't believe in Tarot

I don't believe in Hitler

I don't believe in Jesus

I don't believe in Kennedy

I don't believe in Buddha

I don't believe in Mantra

I don't believe in Gita

I don't believe in Yoga

I don't believe in Kings

I don't believe in Elvis

I don't believe in Zimmerman

I don't believe in Beatles


I just believe in me, Foxy and me, and that's reality


:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...