Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi there,


As part of a house renovation I was required to install a sprinkler. I contracted a sprinkler company do this but unfortunately they did not fit it properly and it resulted in a leak in my kitchen and half of my living room (open plan). After that incident they stopped replying to e-mails and phone messages bar one e-mail which said that they do not accept liability for what happened. I've started small claims proceedings and have just received an e-mail from their appointed Solicitor to say that they will be defending their case. Why I believe I have a strong case I feel nervous about going to court so would be grateful to hear from anyone that has been through the process and wouldn't mind sharing their experience.


Thank you!

It's a pretty straightforward process and there are lots of helpful guides on the internet. Just make sure you comply with any deadlines set by the court and ensure that you have evidence to demonstrate that there was faulty installation or a mistake on their part. If you are very keen to avoid any hearing then you can suggest mediation but you will need to be ready to compromise something in order for the mediation to be effective.
Thanks for your reply SLad. I know the steps for the small claims court and know what to do. I wanted to hear other people's story of their experience, e.g. what was hearing like, what was the Judge like, did they have to enforce the judgement, did they win, etc. that sort of thing.
Had a very positive experience many years ago taking a landlady to small claims for keeping our deposit. I found the magistrate to be no- nonsense and very level headed. We got back 75% of our claim. Good documentation (e.g. All the emails, photos, and bringing someone as a reliable witness if possible are all helpful. Good luck!
Sure, and I acted in 100s of small claims hearings (5 a week at times) in my early career. My point was that if you meet all the deadlines and streamline your submissions and approach to what is needed to prove your case via the very helpful guides that are out there then you're already doing ten times better than most litigants in person and less likely to irritate the Judge. As for what the judge was like and whether other people won/had to enforce their judgments, I'm not sure how that would help you but probably best to try and id at least the court your case is likely to be heard in and the liquidity of your defendant e.g if you're likely to be in Wandsworth cc suing a company with a good balance sheet, you may well have a totally different experience to someone suing their builder in Lambeth Cc. Good luck with it anyway.

I made a claim via smalls claims court and the other side after initially saying the would defend, agreed to settle once they saw the list of evidence I intended to produce.


My brother in law has been twice because of inappropriate behavior by landlords and won both times.


If you can prove the installation is faulty (getting another expert to write that down), that the fault caused the damage and you can clearly document the costs to put everything right you should be in a very strong position. The burden of proof is much lower than in criminal cases so as long as the judge feels your more likely correct in your assertions than the defendant, you'll win.


If you are insured for the damage, your insurance company will handle the case for you typically so its well worth double checking your policy.


Good luck-- I hate scumbag firms that try to wriggle out of putting things right in these types of situations.

Thank you so much for your replies! It is really encouraging to hear your experiences especially as you have managed to get the outcome you want.


While it is daunting to go through the process it is the way to go and I'll definitely take on-board your tips and advice regarding the documentation of the evidence and costs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...