Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've seen the silver 'threp'nee' bits on sale at places like Greenwich Market but I only remember the brass ones. The silver sixpence was known as a 'tanner' the shilling (as brum says)was a 'bob' etc.


I don't remember the crown (five shillings) being in circulation though.


(posted before I read the above post)

(In reply to Shorty)

Quite simple - when you cut and paste bits from the internet, it's normal to let people know where you've got the information from. That way they can go and find out more for themselves if they want to.


Same as when you were cutting and pasting all that website info about the V1 and V2 attacks. Same as when you save an image from the internet (say of the Friern Road prefabs, or of the Dulwich Cino) and then post it pretending that it's an old picture of your own.


The other part of my message is intimating that, in my opinion, you are inventing other usernames in order to have a conversation with yourself, perhaps to validate your own posts. I can't prove this, obviously, and I can't see that it does any harm. It's a trifle misleading perhaps.

Ted thank you for your assumptions, I have never pretended that a presentation was mine or included my name to it.

The items that I posted of the Vi & Vii Bombs were Steve's who is a member here he raised no objection to those being used to further his investigations, and even stated it here.

You are making unsupported remarks that are guiding others to think your way, and act on your belief.

I need no instruction on the use of how to use my posts.

Might it be imagination on your part to suggest that I am talking to myself.

Thank you for giving me credit of other members, I do not want it.

In my very limited time using the computer things are learnt, such as one member picking errors in anothers posts never looking at his/her own, that often show him as dominant, and some times a complete fool.

If you would prefer that I did not post then say so, as the members might agree with you, but on the other hand may support me, and reject you.

I only carry on a subject that gets replies of interest shown.

I have some very doubtful thoughts of members but I do not usually respond to a personal attack.

I joined this website to find my previous neighbours and friends but they have not responded as I looks that they are gone.

This does with your distasteful message make me considder Do I want to remain here?

Regards Shorty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 info@jkec.net Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
    • The contact email for the Major Works Team: majorworks@southwark.gov.uk
    • Best to just get in touch with the council. You need to see what works were approved and the scope.  It's probably advisable to get an independent legal survey (not a standard RICS) and look at current condition, what they said they'd fix, if they did what they said and what the problems are with what they did. Was it just your flat and the other flat mentioned? Asking in case there's any other leaseholder/ tenant involved  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...