Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ah...



The recession has hit the recreational drug world too


The "Mr Big" round the corner to us has hit an all time low in his revenue stream


I over heard him in the "Spar" the other day


"It's f****g hard out there, no ones buying anything"



Never mind, he can watch his 52" inch plasma 'till things get better



W**F

I really can't be arsed with smoking dope I prefer(ED) my narcotics to be more on the 'upper' side of the equation but one thing I've noticed is that many of the really heavy dope smokers i've known have technichally been non-cigarette smokers, in reality I don't think many of them realise is they've actually picked up a nicotine habit and smoke numerous slpiffs to deal with this.


The other thing is constant smoking of poorely rolled unfiltered spliffs can't be good for one in the sense that a joint must equal 2-3 ciggarretes worth of nicotine/tar etc. Harmless my arse, let alone what big says. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for a liberalising the drug laws but a spliff constantly championed as a risk free, natural, gift from god...do me a favour

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I really can't be arsed with smoking dope I

> prefer(ED) my narcotics to be more on the 'upper'

> side of the equation



Hahaha = "ya honestly, I'm not a stoner. Mostly just do coke now that I'm all grown up'n that"


This is gold!

??????? 'cracks' me up!

Are you a politican?? Talk about backtracking.


Erm yeah I'm cool, I Prefered puff, got bored cause that's for kids and boring... Then did'uppers cause me was cool and I prefered it

But hey, that's all for kids now... Cause I'm really grown up now and muture and yeh and stuff.


Kiddo ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...