Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For many months GLA Lib Dems have been highlighting that London police officer numbers are set to fall. Just before Christmas Mayor Boris Johnson was directly challenged about his proposed cut in Police numbers as per his draft budget for 2010-2011. These advanced warnings are now being picked up on and this week were reported in the Guardian newspaper.


Lib Dems proposed a reversal to this cut and to also allow extra police officers for boroughs with the higher gun and knife crime while reducing the overall budget. The Lib Dem proposals can be seen in the group?s budget amendment.


How will this affect Southwark and East Dulwich?

455/32 London Boroughs would result in something like one less police officer for East Dulwich. It doesn't sound much but we only have one Police sargent and two police officers supported by five Police Community Support Officers covering East Dulwich at present.

They could try patrolling in ones instead of twos and threes - be they police officers or the supporting officers. Even if they did during daylight hours, it would mean a good deal more 'policing hours'. Likewise for Southwark Wardens who don't know the meaning of the phrase 'three's a crowd'.

It's worth noting that the cut is due to a reorganisation of custody suites, using staff instead of police officers to run them. So James, your calculation is just misleading. The number of police officers (if we're to take that as a measure of success) is considerably higher than it was in 2000, and crime has more or less continuously fallen across London since the mid 1990s.


The main two things to have come out of the GLA budget process this year relating to the police that should worry people round this way are:


- No guarantees (unlike under Ken) for the Safer Neighbourhood Teams, who we think should be safeguarded against the 6% cuts that the Southwark Borough Commander will have to make. I think our local teams are great, it would be terrible to see them lose any resources.


- Cuts and reorganisation of the road safety units, which local councillor Jenny Jones fought for 8 years to get up to its current standard in London. Given the recent tragic death of the young girl on the corner of East Dulwich Road and Peckham Rye, I think this is something that everyone can agree is vitally important.

It should be noted that not only are we losing 455 officers there has also been a freeze of any new officers coming in for at least 2 years. Another budget cut is only going to make things worse as the freeze was brought in before this announcement.


Safer Neighbourhoods have a good relationship with the local area that officers responding to emergencies are unable to give. I have seen on this forum that East Dulwich safer neighbourhoods have worked well with you all. This personal attention is in danger with these cuts.


Also, officers are already being sent out on their own. Everyone has an opinion on the safety of that and this is not the forum for which i wish to express my opinion on that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...