Jump to content

Covid19 that escaped from laboratory in Wuhan


Recommended Posts

More pieces of the Covid jigsaw puzzle have been falling into place.


The French sold China all the technology and design for an advanced virus laboratory in Wukan. Any such lab can be used to develop germ warfare products.


When it was established, the Chinese refuse to allow the French access the the laboratory. See...

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/coronavirus-china-bars-safety-experts-from-wuhan-lab-brbm9rwtm


China did not advise the WHO until January that there was a new virus existed until January but subsequent evidence has emerged that it was actually out and spreading as far back as October.


Covid19 has now been analysed and found to have a range of characteristics which is believed to be impossible to have developed naturally. One such characteristic is the asymptomatic transmission. Others are the wide range of detrimental effect that it has on victims. Organs affected include lungs, blood, brain and for survivors their health can be impaired long term. This indicates beyond reasonable doubt that the Chinese have been cutting and splicing various viruses in their labs and that Vovid19 escaped.

This week we learned that China has developed a vaccine (surprise, surprise) which it is going to innoculate all its military.

https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/1942868/chinese-coronavirus-vaccine-approved-for-military-use



This week Kong Kong was hit by the big fist of Beijing.


What will the do next?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Covid19 has now been analysed and found to have a range of characteristics which is believed to be impossible to have developed naturally. One such characteristic is the asymptomatic transmission. Others are the wide range of detrimental effect that it has on victims. Organs affected include lungs, blood, brain and for survivors their health can be impaired long term. This indicates beyond reasonable doubt that the Chinese have been cutting and splicing various viruses in their labs and that Vovid19 escaped.


This is not a universally agreed view - others (outside China) argue the opposite (that this was not manufactured). Just because you can quote a source does not mean that source is right. The impact of the pneumonia which follows bad cases is not dissimilar to the impacts of other pneumonias. That the Wuhan lab does gene splicing is not in doubt, that is its purpose. If the virus is very variable, that would argue against a spliced virus, where consistency of effect is one of the requirements. It is possible, of course, that this is a escapee - but many experts with no political axes to grind do not believe this.


And it is hardly surprising that the Chinese, like so many others, including a number in the UK, are working on vaccines and treatments. It is the typical action of a totalitarian state that it would require its military to act as guinea-pigs to test the vaccine - the PLA is a very large organisation and you would need a lot of test subjects to validate a vaccine where the infection rate is currently low (as the Chinese claim).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't really make much difference where it came from now but if it came from a 'wet' market like the first SARS in 2002 then we are doomed to another outbreak


https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/14/asia/china-wet-market-coronavirus-intl-hnk/index.html


The salient points are that 94% of the wet markets on China's mainland were open by 22nd March and that even if a ban is put on illegal trade in wildlife it will move underground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No idea. Ask One Dulwich   No. There are two seperate issues. I believe some cover their plates deliberately (delivery drivers etc) and a number are confused by signage. I spend a lot of time in that area and have only ever seen one car drive through and it was an elderly couple who were incredibly confused (and subsequently very apologetic to an angry cyclist who was calling them all the names under the sun).   Some questions for you to answer now: 1) Which consultation are you referring to? 2) Did you agree with the council's insistence on keeping the junction closed to emergency vehicles despite the emergency services telling them it was delaying response times?   3) At a time of funding crisis do you think £1.5m is a good spend to redesign a junction and those redesigns: - potentially increase emergency vehicle response times - do nothing to stop persistent number plate covering offenders - do nothing to slow cyclists at a pedestrian area  
    • I tell you what, I've answered every question you've posed to me on this thread so far, so before you deflect any further, why don't you address the simple questions I've put to you several times first. Here, give them a go: Who has been pressurising the emergency services and how? Do you genuinely believe that people are partially covering their plates and driving through the square due to inadequate signage?  
    • Which original consultation?    Err be careful with the expert opinion and data part.....if you think the cycle lobby and Aldred et al is the sole source of sound opinion on such issues! 😉 And this is where they fell foul of the law and had to re-run the consultation. It actually casts huge doubt on a lot of previous consultations (including the latest DV one) as they do not pass the legal watermark because they do not provide a yes/no response. The council are terrified of a judicial review because, I suspect under legal advice, they know they cheated the system in many previous consultations. Do you remember when the council claimed they had a mandate for the CPZs because of some seriously dodgy research conducted with a large tranche of students in the north of the borough in 2018.....
    • Perhaps the issue is that Southwark don’t listen. They didn’t take account of responses. The proposed CPZs for west Dulwich  stopped when the Council was threatened with a judicial review. Not before. Whatever consultation process was worse than flawed with McAsh arguing that because they were in power, they had a mandate and didn’t need to listen to anyone’s views, rendering any democratic process void. The criteria for LTNs was high population density, high public transport usage and low car ownership so Dulwich Village was a perfect candidate…not. Just a coincidence but I believe some councillors live within the scheme 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...