Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've just been looking at https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/vaccine-studies/approved-vaccine-studies/ for details of the research project looking at the effects of combining the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines. They're currently looking for volunteer subjects age 50 or over. The London centres involved are UCH and St Georges, Tooting. They want people who haven't had any dose at all yet. They'll be giving two doses, of either the same or different vaccines, at an interval of 4 or 12 weeks. Both those choices will be made randomly, and without informing the subjects of the vaccines used until the end of the study, which lasts a year. More at the above link.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/276409-vaccine-type-combination-study/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I was tempted by it, but then found the understandable bar on those who've already had one jab -- it would presumably clash with their protocol and potentially mess up any randomisation. I thought it would be useful to pass on, to save anyone else from spending too much time before reaching that dead end, and in case it was of use to those in lower priority groups. Though I did leave them to discover that there are also small possible 'costs' involved, like the several follow-up tests.


I'm quite open so far to having a mix-and-match imposed on me whenever the second jab is offered, based on the vagueish preconception that there are benefits in heterogeneity. OTOH, perhaps I've been over-influenced by such as Tim Spector's advice to eat 30 varieties of plant each week. Who knows?

ianr Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've just been looking at

> https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/vaccine-studie

> s/approved-vaccine-studies/ for details of the

> research project looking at the effects of

> combining the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines.

> They're currently looking for volunteer subjects

> age 50 or over. The London centres involved are

> UCH and St Georges, Tooting. They want people who

> haven't had any dose at all yet. They'll be

> giving two doses, of either the same or different

> vaccines, at an interval of 4 or 12 weeks. Both

> those choices will be made randomly, and without

> informing the subjects of the vaccines used until

> the end of the study, which lasts a year. More at

> the above link.


A vaccine that hasn't been long term tested, One that hasn't been tested against allergies, One that hasn't been tested in pregnant women? One That doesn't stop you from catching the virus? One that doesn't stop you from transmitting the virus? I wonder why anybody would ever think it may actually be a waste of time or even dangerous to those who take it ? Only 45000 Adverse reactions reported so far in the UK so should be fine https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Peckhampam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> to Uplandrd2020

>

> For adverse re-action read mild side effects. A

> sore arm and a headache would seem more than

> acceptable.

> "Doesn't stop you from catching the virus" Could

> you quote your proofs.

Most sites say Covid vaccine just reduces Symptoms, https://www.fredhutch.org/en/news/center-news/2020/12/covid-19-vaccines-transmission.html

Your site says clearly that the vaccines stop people getting ill but that it is not yet known if they stop transmission. Stopping people getting ill is what we want from a vaccine. If you want to peddle misinformation you seriously will have to do better than this. Up your game uplands.
  • 1 month later...

There's a new second study, COM-COV2 https://comcovstudy.org.uk/participate, which is looking for those aged 50+ who've so far had just one AstraZeneca or Pfizer vaccination between 25th January 2021 and 20th March 2021. Participants will be randomly given either the same vaccine or one of the new Novavax or Moderna vaccines. There'll be blood sampling sessions over a ten month period to test your immune response. There are now three London centres. They say "We are enrolling from all ethnicities and would particularly welcome participants from the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) community."


I'm ruled out of this one too, having had both shots.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...