Request a Tradesperson
Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!
Subforums
-
- 883
- posts
-
- 895
- posts
41,812 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 590 views
-
- 0 replies
- 304 views
-
- 0 replies
- 354 views
-
- 0 replies
- 266 views
-
- 1 reply
- 365 views
-
- 1 reply
- 410 views
-
- 0 replies
- 89 views
-
- 1 reply
- 361 views
-
- 0 replies
- 367 views
-
- 0 replies
- 223 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 407 views
-
- 2 replies
- 892 views
-
- 4 replies
- 695 views
-
- 0 replies
- 348 views
-
- 0 replies
- 479 views
-
- 1 reply
- 440 views
-
- 5 replies
- 996 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 303 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 0 replies
- 137 views
-
- 1 reply
- 333 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Disclaimer, some of the later SMB stuff is insipid but I like this. I -
I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money. When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too. Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.
-
I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one. Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!! -
Let me get this straight . The OP was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation? You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong. What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he? And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
-