Jump to content

Request a Tradesperson

Need a job done? Require a plumber, builder, gardener...? Ask in here!


Subforums

  1. Cleaners

    Request regular cleaning, housekeeping, end of tenancy cleaning, window cleaning etc.

    842
    posts
  2. Tutors & Coaching

    Offering or request tuition or coaching - academic, language sport or musical.

    826
    posts

41,728 topics in this forum

  1. Tanning

    • 4 replies
    • 874 views
    • 10 replies
    • 2.7k views
    • 0 replies
    • 319 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
  2. Floor sander person

    • 7 replies
    • 679 views
    • 4 replies
    • 1k views
    • 0 replies
    • 369 views
    • 1 reply
    • 581 views
    • 10 replies
    • 726 views
    • 8 replies
    • 795 views
    • 2 replies
    • 477 views
    • 1 reply
    • 439 views
    • 2 replies
    • 588 views
    • 3 replies
    • 628 views
    • 1 reply
    • 551 views
  3. Burglar Alarms

    • 0 replies
    • 462 views
    • 0 replies
    • 432 views
    • 5 replies
    • 561 views
    • 0 replies
    • 392 views
    • 0 replies
    • 207 views
    • 0 replies
    • 670 views
  4. kitchen tap

    • 1 reply
    • 532 views
    • 2 replies
    • 424 views
    • 0 replies
    • 478 views
    • 0 replies
    • 401 views
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...