General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,361 topics in this forum
-
- 0 replies
- 613 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.1k views
-
- 9 replies
- 844 views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 461 views
-
- 1 reply
- 254 views
-
- 2 replies
- 929 views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 9 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 22 replies
- 7k views
-
- 6 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 265 views
-
- 19 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 1 reply
- 2.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 124 views
-
- 48 replies
- 11.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 1k views
-
- 17 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 50 replies
- 8.5k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 0 replies
- 825 views
-
- 27 replies
- 3.9k views
-
- 4 replies
- 257 views
-
- 12 replies
- 2.8k views
-
- 3 replies
- 1.1k views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By richard tudor · Posted
Does anyone have the same problem. I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible. Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal. -
By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted
You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east. -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys! -
By Jenijenjen · Posted
The sites in question though are not comparable to the builders yard by the station and less likely to be granted planning permission for 9 storey buildings. The builders yard fronts on to the railway line on one side and virtually no residential property surrounding on the other sides. The Gibbs & Dandy /Kwikfit and ED trading trading estate are surrounded at close proximity by residential, and in the case of the latter a Grade II building, so there would more stringent height restrictions. Both these sites are tired and sad looking, and in need of development to provide much needed housing. -
Not sure if this is any help but was initally told to use google chrome as the browser and the code was the reference. However the person at Southwark parking took pity on me and did it for me
-