General ED Issues / Gossip
Discuss life in London's East Dulwich
17,292 topics in this forum
-
- 66 replies
- 7.9k views
-
- 19 replies
- 4.1k views
-
- 4 replies
- 993 views
-
- 0 replies
- 131 views
-
- 0 replies
- 109 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.2k views
-
- 257 replies
- 10.1k views
-
- 11 replies
- 1.3k views
-
- 10 replies
- 1.8k views
-
- 12 replies
- 2.4k views
-
- 27 replies
- 3.6k views
-
- 0 replies
- 485 views
-
- 0 replies
- 655 views
-
- 61 replies
- 6.4k views
-
- 4 replies
- 772 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1.1k views
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
- 1 reply
- 843 views
-
- 20 replies
- 4.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 96 views
-
- 7 replies
- 835 views
-
- 20 replies
- 2.3k views
-
- 0 replies
- 129 views
-
- 27 replies
- 2.7k views
-
- 0 replies
- 950 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... -
Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority.
-
By sunshine_m · Posted
Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment -
Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally? I've just been looking through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022. So it seems that, in this particular, it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation. I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.
-