The Lounge
The place to relax and chat about anything.
22,729 topics in this forum
-
- 2 replies
- 571 views
-
- 0 replies
- 442 views
-
- 0 replies
- 416 views
-
- 0 replies
- 397 views
-
- 4 replies
- 484 views
-
- 7 replies
- 606 views
-
- 0 replies
- 330 views
-
- 3 replies
- 468 views
-
- 2 replies
- 593 views
-
- 8 replies
- 818 views
-
- 16 replies
- 983 views
-
- 2 replies
- 719 views
-
- 22 replies
- 1.7k views
-
- 13 replies
- 1k views
-
- 0 replies
- 84 views
-
- 0 replies
- 82 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1.5k views
-
- 0 replies
- 370 views
-
- 5 replies
- 816 views
-
- 0 replies
- 193 views
-
- 0 replies
- 74 views
-
- 0 replies
- 96 views
-
- 0 replies
- 120 views
-
- 0 replies
- 347 views
-
- 0 replies
- 120 views
-
-
Latest Discussions
-
By diable rouge · Posted
Comparing to Week 11 last season, the table is a lot more compact, even the distance between top and bottom is half of what it was when RC was a runaway leader on 90+ points. Also worth remembering there are 25 or so game weeks left, so any points difference can slowly be eroded away. Week 11 points... Week 11 table.... -
-
This concerns me as it essentially disregards the significant number of people who do experience a high level of disruption because of the event. While it's great that you personally are not inconvenienced, this is absolutely not the case for a great many residents many of whom are elderly or who do not have private gardens and rely on the park. Great that you have a PHD in ecology but might also be worth reading the report into the environmental impact of Gala which paints a rather different story to yours. This comes round every year with a request to extend. This seems to me to be a distraction to steer everyone away from the main event. However, Southwark Council and Councillor Catherine Rose in particular must bear responsibility for what is effectively privatisation of our community space. I requested data on the results of the last consultations and had to use a subject access request to get it. In 2024 the council received 111 responses of which 108 were negative. The event went ahead. Last year they received 136 of which 82 were negative and 34 said only with major changes (which did not happen). The impact of the event on the community and the enviroment is well-documented. The council has so far refused to supply data on the demographics of the attendees but it doesn't take much to work out that this is largely single under 30s from out of borough judging by the steady stream of people from the station. Please do take time to protest and also to email Events as we try to hold the council accountable for their disregard of the public consultation results. Appendix 1.pdf 2025 consultation.pdf -
-