huncamunca

Visting Nazi Peadophiles should be given a formal state welcome & a police escort...STRAIGHT TO WORMWOOD SCRUBS

Loving your work here sillysue One of the best comedy characters I've seen on this board for a long while

gang activity

should take more care when dressing.Or get his Butler to check him over before leaving the house (Bottom Graphic in article) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1310605/Lib-Dems-revolt-Osbornes-plans-hit-workshy-4bn-welfare-cuts.html

The new pramface A new meme apparently, relating to ED residents Anyone else heard this one ?

gang activity

The slaughter of Cetaceans is regrettable but in the marine big scheme of things, pretty much an irrelevance.The impact of their total removal would be emotional, but would have negligible effect on the Biomass of the areas they inhabit The Japanese still hunt for political reasons - the prefectures that have the whaling fleets carry a big clout & no one will push through a decision that will impact on them. We can't really bleat about this though - We have the same situation in the UK, especially around the Scots' ports, despite overwhelming evidence to suggest we are likely past the tipping point for white fish. The Japanese have warehouses full of whale meat that no one, 'cept the oldies, eat any more. Cods aren't cuddly or have cartoons made about them, but have a far greater importance to marine health than the whales do. Incidentaly, the West was responsible for the decimation of the whale population if the first instance, so we ought not to point fingers. The Japanese - arguably correct to a degree - think that their hunting activities are singled out because of cultural differences with the liberal West. Maybe not racism, but the lazy demonisation and belittling of an entire people isn't usually a good start to getting things sorted out.- and this isn't too far from the current opinion of many Whilst every middle class gap year Brit would sell his sole to get a few months on the Sea Shepherd to pad out his moribund CV, it is a diversion. Whilst smug Guardian readers support the likes of the Sea Shepherds, much the movement stinks of hypocracy, pomposity and self aggrandisement. Whilst we worry about the slaughter of a few whales - and make no mistake they are not in any imminent danger of extinction - The European fleets vacuum these waters of every living thing they can find. Wider afield, industrial fleets pay a few bribes and strip the inshore waters of Africa in a similar fashion. This is the real issue but doesn't have a USP that Disney can harness to its profit, so goes unnoticed. We all know about the Grand Banks Cod extermination but we forget that there used to be a Tuna season off Yorkshire until relatively recently. When was the last time you were offered a British caught Tuna ? Vewing an emotional doc about Cetacean slaught isn't pleasant, but it's lazy and emotive. Have a look at "The end of the line" if you want to be truly appalled. In fact you can probabaly rent it at the soon to be no more Rental shop on LL. whilst on the way to Moxons for your Swordfish steaks with your weekend Guardian tucked under your arm.

gang activity

Gang activity

Passing by the other day, it looked like the charity Mind had shut up shop.. Is this so? If it is I am sorry to see it go...

.

Narnia Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > But if you haven't fulfilled the insurers T&C's > then how can you be insured? Surely the vehicle > being taxed and therefore having an MOT would be a > requirement of any car insurance policy. The insurers indemnify you for liability to others & in turn, you accept their T&C as part of the contract.They cannot dismiss a claim against you if a car is not taxed, but will in turn use this breach on contract on your side to claim the expense back from you. They can cancel the insurance should they wish, but not in a retrospective manner that would imperil any ongoing claims.innit.

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Please be aware. > > If you do not have a Tax Disc but do have > insurance, that insurance is INVALID. > > If you have an accident you are NOT COVERED > > So if you still think people should mind their > own business, It is everyones business. incorrect. you are insured but leave yourself open to subsequent legal action to recover any costs incurred by the insurer as you may not have fulfilled the T&C of the insurance contract.

It will be stripped by now or sitting in a container om Rainham Marshes waiting to be shipped off Im afraid - Just get the insurance claim started asap.

the bike has plates. No, you dont need a helmet IIRC for road legal quads, hence the balaclava - may be iffy but not illegal

If I understand it correctly, community schools do have an obligation to their local community as part of the Extended Schools remit and so to offer their building as a polling station is quite appropriate. The school can use it as an INSET day for teachers, which would be a day when teachers were in without pupils at another time if not election day. So it seems a win/win to me.

from here linky

http://www.andybarefoot.com/politics/poster.php?line1=East+Dulwich&line2=Where+all+children+are+above+average&logo1=KEEP&logo2=IT&logo3=SO&tagline1=+We+will+look+after+your+East+Dulwich.Innit.&size=3

you dont have to eat a dog shit to know it tastes bad, so why bother musing over how it would taste if served with truffle oil and porcini mushrooms, on a bed of saffron rice innit. If you want to enter a debate on god, then come up with something new, rather than a cod rehash of a couple of thousand years of someo elses dreary metaphysical & turgid theological ramblings. anyway, this intellectual pygmy will be off next week to take on "new challeges", so it will be back to orthodox Huncamnunca postings, but I will sometimes check back on read oonly on read only to see whether a verdict has been reached on this particular subject.I am not holding my acerbic breath.

its a discussion about god, of course its going to be frivolous, as you are dealing with the absurd - this kind of debate invariably ends with piss taking by 50% & the other 50% trying to out philosphise each other & score points with mammoth cut n past wikipedia bollocks.

this one caught mine From Guardian lite sunday rag

All jobs are dreadful

And the winner of this competition is.... *drum roll* the BNP lets give a big hand to all involved for this fantastic achievement.

I'm loving this thread This lot are about as politically significant as the chuckle brothers, except the Chuckles make me laugh more. Chaudry has pulled off a huge victory here, because of our knee jerk response and media fuelled outrage - have we really become this sad, that a handful of media savvy islamo fascists are able to manipulate our emotions and score such a huge PR scam so easily ? get a grip people. ROFL, LOL etc

modelman Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi, all. I work in Sainsburys, and during a > condensed induction day, I observed approximately > 10mins of the company DVD detailing how to > confront a suspected shop lifter, which may I add > did not resolve the situation whatsoever. I > recently completed my studies in physics, and with > graduate jobs seldom advertised over Christmas, > decided to earn my keep during the festive period > working part time in Sainsburys as it was a job > advertised at short notice. In my opinion it is a > tad mundane, you are treated like a child and, my > weekly earnings yield a difference of > approximately ?10 to that of jobseekers allowance. > I could quite happily part with the cash so I may > wallow in my bed while the rest of the rat race > continues to run the wheel. Fortunately I am fit > and able to work, so I put aside what academic > merits I have accumulated and, pursue work I could > have easily secured upon leaving school. I have > encountered many characters in store akin to that > of Eater81 who lack the intellectual capacity to > fathom that there is no correlation between pay > and the calibre of staff employed in an > establishment such as this. Such an attitude is > belittling, rude and, detrimental to the image of > my colleagues, who like me are just between their > preferred job, or trying to support a family. I > have yet to encounter a ?muppet? within the store, > I imagine some do exist, as in any place of work, > take yours for instance. Perhaps the manner in > which you approach them provokes that sort of > response, ever encountered Newton?s 3rd law? > > ?14k a year may be peanuts, but at least it buys > me manners. a worthy post