aquarius moon

If it's a central area, what is the point of that? So I would have to carry my 3 little dogs through the dogs allowed to run free area to get to the dogs on lead only area, in order to avoid large dogs running free! Unless the areas are accessible via a main gate directly from a road, it is rather defeating the object, don't you think?!

Whereabouts is the dogs on lead only area in Peckham Rye park?

DaveR Wrote: -----------------------------------------------------. > > I asked earlier in the thread what I thought was a > simple question - would it be acceptable for > Southwark to decide that a minimum proportion of > all public parks be dog-free? (Say 30% by area). > A further proportion be dogs on leads only (say > another 30%), and the balance unrestricted. The > figures I have chosen are arbitrary, but why is > there anything wrong in principle? There is nothing wrong with this idea. I totally agree with you & said pretty much the same thing myself on page 2 of this thread. A dog-free area, a dogs allowed to run free area, and a dogs on lead only area. That way, everyone can have the choice of which part of the park to visit, depending on their circumstances.

Yay Foxy! Back to you....again!

No. His main priority was to look after number one

Not him either

Sorry, all wrong!

First clue: The sky's the limit for this character

Thanks Foxy. John Lennon is my hero, so he was the first person I thought of. Will be back later with a clue, as need to have a think!

Yoko Ono!?

John Lennon?

Is the 37 still going up East Dulwich Rd & stopping outside Costcutter? Will need to get this bus tomorrow & these emergency roadworks can take days!

numbers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > but there are so many regular posters AQ, how > would anyone remember all of them in order to send > a PM? > In that case, forget everyone else and just send one to me! :)

The way I see it: If somebody wants to change their username due to threatening messages/troll abuse etc.,that's fine. But it might be nice if they informed regular posters, who they know are ok, of the change (maybe by PM?) Just a thought. Personally, I don't plan to change mine, as I like being me!

Comic books are really not my thing!

Who is he?!

El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Ooh, my correct score was the Fulham game, me and > 3% of folk. > The rest of my predictions were shocking!!! Not as bad as mine!

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ...and a bonus.....agent Lomas doing his job well Not funny. (You are most welcome to have him back)

Krypto the superdog?

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I was me before I went through a wardrobe and then > returned to being me but in an anagram sort of > way. I wasn't referring to you either. I liked your previous name, kind of cool & mysterious! What made you come back through the wardrobe?!

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've an idea who it is but I had to research it so > not sure if that counts. Yes, it does count. Nowhere in the rules does it say you are not allowed to research/google etc. No, I'm not there just yet... So, go for it.

I wasn't referring to you. I know who you are! :)

....are so annoying. I have to spend valuable time trying to figure out who they are!

Liverpool 2 Stoke 0 Arsenal 1 Villa 0 Norwich 1 Everton 2 Sunderland 1 Fulham 1 Swansea 0 Man Utd 0 WBA 3 Saints 0 W.Ham 0 Cardiff 1 Palace 1 Spurs 2 Chelsea 4 Hull 0 Man C 1 Newcastle 0 Chelsea 2 Villa 1

Mr Grey? (as in 'Fifty Shades Of') And no, I haven't read it!