Alan Medic

Friends of Goodrich Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Its good to see the referee's perspective declan. > All very interestting and shows how ignorant the > itv pundits are. Is that you Mick?

Is this the first time you've used it? Did you connect it wirelessly yourself?

Only a veggie would know that katie1763. It's like a 6th sense, except it's 7th. Ted of course is The E Dealer. Who is Rose btw? A veggie? PS: If you are stuck for something to do, send me a PM.

Can posts by non veggies be removed ted? Have you had a word with Admin? Can't comment on best Sunday lunch though. Hardly ever eat out. However I do like the Thai Corner Cafe for a veggie meal.

A ref's forum Someone needs to defend him........ I think what upset most people (on TV) was their expectations of what the game would be like were ruined. What we got was a different but still exceptional game, mostly from Wales. Could 14 menovercome the disadvantage, and how? "Rolland u've had a shocker.... Not the first time either!!! Were not here to watch u...." This is what Mark Cueto Tweeted about the red card. He could have been talking about England.

Ed Morrison, head of elite referee development at the Rugby Football Union, confirmed on Radio 5 live that referee Alain Rolland was "100% right" to send off Warburton, adding that dropping a player from shoulder level is automatic red card. Wales should have won regardless. They missed some kicks.

Some older rugby fans might be interested in a programme tonight on the Lions 1971 visit to NZ. It's on BBC1 Wales @ 10.35pm. However it is on other BBC channels next week too. Good luck Wales tomorrow though whoever wins I'd like to see them win it outright. One for the NH.

I don't remember ordering one.

Thanks, Dulwich Fox.

DaveR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "Has anybody noticed how arrogant and > self-important people seem to be in East Dulwich, > especially on Saturdays? You would've thought > they were living in a Royal Borough, or the > like." > > Has anybody noticed how many people come on here > to complain about other people in the most > generalised and sweeping terms, especially 'middle > class' people and parents? > > You would've thought they'd have something better > to do. I don't think you should take a post like this from a '1st time poster' too seriously. He/she hasn't returned since.

Willard Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Virus, been downloading too much grot... Which grot do you mean?

I did an AVG scan yesterday but that didn't detect anything. Am now doing a malware one. I was joking ted about sending them to myself. I've received other emails with similar addresses/subject matter also but realised these were not from who I was supposed to think they were from. What would detecting the real sender allow me to do apart from what I'm doing already?

The subject matter is usually something I'd expect to get. Am I doing this in my sleep or is there something afoot?

The answer should be here.

I would guess so though would need to confirm. What regulation might that be breaking if this is the case?

As he can lock his door, the only available ground floor exit for the others is the back door. Didn't see any fire detectors. I'm wondering now just how many things are wrong about this rental?

Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Cmon Ireland. Hopefully get a decent draw for the > play offs. I want them to do well but they are painful to watch.

73

I never understood that expression though I know what it's meant to mean. If I had a cake why shouldn't I eat it? Anyway, is someone trying to say it's wrong for landlords to charge a rent (if they can) that's more than their mortgage for the property? Don't understand why anyone would think that unless you think it's morally wrong. It's business. My son is sharing a house with 3 other students. It's actually a 2 bedroomed house but the front room has been converted* into a bedroom, presumably to squeeze more tenants in and thus be able to increase the rent. So to get in to the house other than through the front door (which is in my son's bedroom) they must go through the back door. To access this they must walk through the neighbours back yard as it is the only way in. I've emailed the landlady regarding the situation of them having to trespass to get in to the house (I never saw the place until I dropped my son there). I still await a reply, though it's been some days now. Now this sort of landlord is taking the pi**. * they put some bedroom furniture in it

What's happening Nette? Same post 3 hours apart. Is this personal?

Surely if their contract isn't up they are not required to move out?

Anyone give me 40?

How dreadful that a tenant should insist on paying rent on time. No wonder you want to get rid of them.

Have you suggested something elsewhere Damian? I'd be interested to read it.

http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/ksm/lowres/ksmn2421l.jpg Mr.Ben advises the EDF of his latest idea!