red devil

..either that or get a new ISP address

Did someone mention counting?..

I think the Forum could be haunted, when you click on BITE's posting history, there's nothing...oooooohhhhh, spooky!

Good result for the Bhoys. Assuming they will now qualify for the group stage, and with Rangers demise and the SPL title a virtual shoe-in, it's surely an ideal opportunity for Celtic to concentrate all their efforts on trying to qualify from the group stage...

I can certainly see the similarities in the style stakes...well ahead of the curve http://www.spin.com/sites/all/files/styles/style620_413/public/field/image/1009-phil-collins-getty-ima.jpg

He's far too young for you Netty, leave him alone...

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > red devil Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Nope, and I can't see Soros making a quick gain > as > > they have already dropped 2+% since the > > float...unless of course he 'knows > > something'...please God, let it be true > > Soros had made billions by going short when the UK > government withdrew from the ERM on black > wednesday. > > So maybe we're about to see a demise of man utd > similar to that of Rangers. Conference league > football, RD? I don't think so, like it or not the debt is serviceable, the recent Chevrolet shirt sponsorship covers a huge chunk of it, it's just annoying to the fans to see this money being siphoned off instead of being invested in players and the ground...someone will buy Utd for a decent price when the Glazers decide to fook off, it's just getting rid of the fookers that's the problem...

I'd watch what you're saying Jeremy, according to one of the Olympic threads, Ms B has the physique of a male Indonesian weightlifter...

This is yummy...http://www.ocado.com/webshop/recipe/coconut-and-lime-cake/1000604

Nope, and I can't see Soros making a quick gain as they have already dropped 2+% since the float...unless of course he 'knows something'...please God, let it be true

woodrot Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > red devil Wrote: > > > > > I'm surprised anybody, let alone Soros would > want > > to invest in Utd knowing the terms of the > float. > > In theory the Glazers could sell 89.99% of the > > club and still retain board control. > > > > > You sure about that ? I did say 'in theory' Woody ;-) There are two types of shares, Class A and Class B. Class B shares, which only the Glazers own, are supposed to carry 10 times the voting power (control) of the Class A shares (which were offered at the IPO). Maybe my maths is askew, but I'm sure the Glazers can easily relenquish more than 50% of the capital worth of the club to investors, yet still maintain overall control. Factor in that Class A shares don't even pay a dividend, and to a novice like me it's amazing that anyone was interested in buying them...perhaps some of the City boys amongst us would like to throw some light on it? From the net... For % club ownership, 8,333,333 shares are being sold by the Glazers, 8,333,334 being sold by United and a potential 16,000,000 to be awarded to employees. All Class A (1 vote compared to 10 for Class B ). Total shares are: Class A: 39,685,700; Class B: 124,000,000. After IPO: Glazers own all Class B and 58% (assuming 2.5m extra shares aren't sold) of Class A shares. Works out at 98.7% of voting power.

Did someone mention counting?..

Marmora Man has been quiet lately... *coughs*

Undisputedtruth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Anyway, now that you've got George Soros as > shareholder, a few billion here or there would be > enough to build a good team. I'm surprised anybody, let alone Soros would want to invest in Utd knowing the terms of the float. In theory the Glazers could sell 89.99% of the club and still retain board control. The only good thing about the IPO was that it now gives the club a value to potential buyers...

I think 'shocking' is a bit OTT. They are notorious poor starters, but that is something Moyes has tried to address by changing their pre-season. They were the first club to start pre-season training, but were also given a week off. I thought they ran out of steam in the last 20mins, and got through on andrenalin and a terrific home support...it was their cup final afterall ;-)

Spanner + denim = KiwkFit fitter...you can't get better

New season, same old defensive injury crisis. Fair play to the Toffees, they played to their strengths and our weakness. I'm surprised Rooney wasn't hauled off, he looked a lot less sharp than Welbeck. Looking forward to first home game against Fulham, when I'm sure RVP will start...

I've just realised who UDT is, he's that bloke off the telly - Gok Wan. Or, as all the fashionistas in Nunhead like to call him - Go Wank...

Transalated it literally means...''Fookin' ell, I'm starving!''

What Applesideer said, the last time I was there, there were also a few racks inside the station concourse. The best thing to do is invest in a couple of high quality locks. Speak to a bike shop about other anti-theft measures...

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is this to go with the one of dropping 3 divisions > in one season? Sky have had to issue an apology to Rangers. Rangers games this season will not be shown in 3D as suggested, instead it should have read D3.

Chippy Minton Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Liverpool to win away at West Brom AND score > twice? > > There's surprising and just plain ludicrous! You're right Chippy, what was I thinking...can't say I'm disappointed though :)

Don't listen to him Foxy, 'wall are a fine upstanding football club, built on tradition and strong community values, I even fancy a visit there myself this season....shall I bring my knuckledusters?

Well, if you're successful with your purchase you can get creative with it...how about turning it into a low level table? Get a purpose made top, nice bit of chunky timber, and sit it on top of the inspection chamber with enough overhang to hide it from general view. The weight should self-support it without the need to fix it down, making it easy to remove should Thames Water need access. I'm sure there are other things you could do to lessen it's impact...

Semantics aside, the bottom line is that any landlord/lady is legally obliged to provide the tenant with an up to date Landlord's Certificate of all gas appliances, regardless of who installed them. It's in the tenant's best interest to check that the Cert has been signed by a Gas Safe registered engineer, if it hasn't, get out of there, as you're obviously dealing with an unscrupulous landlord/lady... http://england.shelter.org.uk/get_advice/renting_and_leasehold/rights_and_responsibilities/landlords_responsibilities#4