This has come up in several recent threads and speaks very much to the whole equality debate. I believe we should. The results for counties (and LEAS) - Essex, Kent, Bucks, etc - that still have selection speak volumes even the results from the Secondary Moderns in selected areas are still better than 25% of comprehensives at GCSE. In Northern Ireland which is totally selective, 72% get 5As or better at GCSE compared to 62% nationally Until Comprehensive education, private education was in decline (and it looked terminal.) The decline in the share of university attendance from the bottom decile of income families started within a generation of Comprehensive Education?this is even further exaggerated when you look at Oxbridge. Basically If you were born in poverty (as in the bottom 10% of income households) in the 50s and 60s you had a better chance of going to university and Oxbridge than now. Comprehensive education has been a terrible case of lowest common denominator thinking. It has exaggerated class divide, widened the gap between rich and poor and lowered standards. House prices around those comprehensives that achieve good results are significantly higher than those that don?t further separating rich and poor. The whole experiment was a typical exercise in social engineering that I believe has decreased the overall standard of education, widened the social equality gap, been a massive boost to private education and exposed the hypocrisy of middleclass socialism ? left wing politicians wriggling their children out of the state system is a truly laughable and ultimately disgusting spectacle in hypocrisy. All of these were put forward as criticism of comprehensive education before it was introduced back then and they largely been proven true