????
-
Posts
15,841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Events
Blogs
FAQ
Tradespeople Directory
Jobs Board
Store
Everything posted by ????
-
Out of touch Archbishop on Social networking or a truth?
???? replied to ????'s topic in General ED Issues / Gossip
I suspect the Catholic church was making similar statements about printing at the time of William Laxton -
Burnley, Hull, Birmingham are favourites with the bookies this morning (then Wolves then Pompey)
-
....but good luck Nikki, ignore old cynics like me
-
I wouldm't hold your breath - estate agents in the 80s were saying how 'the tube was coming to Camverwell' and you think there's money about for this type of capital expenditure at the moment? Wishfull thinking.
-
or The Idiot
-
yeah, thanks for doing your job, hero
-
Want a flake with that Tony?
-
Bollox - first Smarties now Vosene
-
Sean - no probs, no fall out, no need for an apology. Hopefully see you Friday?
-
???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > apologies, I can see how what I posted was > construed to refer to a deletion but I was talking > generally not about a specific post I didn't see > or a deletion, sure the moderation was right on > that Here.
-
Sean MP= Mockney Piers I meant thread AND..if you scroll back a bit you'll see I didn't see that post but said I'm sure it was moderated fairly and rightly so from what Anna and Moos (them two again...I dunno)
-
I think I'll be along but going on holiday the next day so....'only a couple'
-
logic or hope
-
*grabs Special Brew*
-
I dunno, shapley green bottles
-
*Looks at Red Devil and MP in a whose going to be the first to make a move manner, rues BBW's abscence*
-
My point MP, was that this post was throwing up the sort of moral idignation that was considered very 'Daily Mail' at the time of the expenses furore, that's all...
-
Go an put the kettle on Moos there's a darlin'
-
See previous Moos
-
apologies, I can see how what I posted was construed to refer to a deletion but I was talking generally not about a specific post I didn't see or a deletion, sure the moderation was right on that
-
I didn't see the post was just making a point on the virtiol poured down on two posters who are being honest about what they'd do and many others would - as it happens I wouldn't, but many people would do what they are saying
-
Go in the drawing room and listen to some Leonard Cohen
-
mmmm... some people on the EDF were far too cool to be worried about the common man's petty obsessions with MPs expenses - but Starmix is beyond the pail for being honest about taking advantage of someones misfortune...(or if not honest at least taking a contrary position) *Goes away scratching head once again*
-
"current freedoms enjoyed my women" ..do you let your Harem out in the sun at lunchtime nowadays Brendan?
-
Make it results/ achievement focussed rather than "This is what I did" - eg "Whilst I was front of van, Ice cream sales rose by 10% and the higher value add Double 99s by 20%" Employers want to see evidence of achievement not what your job function was and most CVs are crap on this Edited for: Employees/Employers what's the bloody difference