Dog duck

Kate's bush? ed_pete Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > D'you think she's got a vajazzle or does William > prefer a hollywood ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *I'll get me coat*

A week or so ago whilst purchasing, Terry Jones came in to the EDD, only to be fawned upon by the owner... I felt a bit 'car sick'

Go to bloody Paris or somewhere! Jeez...

Roger Moore

This is very bad news... It can't be due to poor sales etc. It was started up by the chap in Barry's shop next door. Perhaps it's a rent issue or a offer that couldn't be refused?

Theakston

People who don't know when to prune their victoria plum tree.

...when you turn your landing light off.

It's a revolting dirty flee pit of a place with lazy idiots running it. Just don't go there... maybe you could try Greenwich picture house.

Absolutely Bonkers! 55 pages of property cr*p, some over the top fashion nonsense and a couple of interesting (ish) features and single pages of local interest. Better than that SE22 dross tho. Good print & stock... can't begin to imagine who would pay ?3.95 for it?

Wow! How fascinating, not! People will start posting threads about walking round dog sh*t next. Oh, they already do...

...perhaps a tactical air strike

jcrwillcox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Although I know it's summer and the sun is shining > and I do love that. Who else is getting excited > about Christmas? Hope I'm not the only one? You sad sad person... how old are you? 6?

Roundabout Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > East Dulwich GROVE - LL end - Gas works done: NOW > ALL CLEAR Yeah, until someone has to return to repair the ***ked up raised brick junction paving bit that was ruined by the heavy lorries and digging equipment that was used to mend the gas leak!

MrBen Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dog duck - I sense you are a frustrated creative. > Someone who can spot mediocrity and who yearns and > has a passion for better. That is a positive > entrepreneurial quality. You just need to find the > right channel for that. And personally, if you > want to make any money, I don't think its an SE22 > magazine replacement. Plenty other ideas out there > though for those with your talents though surely? You make some fair points MrBen... perhaps I was just stupidly fantasizing about driving around in my car emblazoned with logos etc telling everyone about my great magazine company!

Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'd like to know DD why you might even think ED > needs a credible magazine? It doesn't. Why shouldn't ED have a credible magazine?

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > cred?i?ble (krd-bl) > > adj. > > 1. Capable of being believed; plausible. > 2. Worthy of confidence; reliable. > 3. Being of sufficient military capability to > deter an attack or carry out an operation > successfully: credible military force. > > > ETA: So I'm unclear why SE22 magazine is > considered not "credible". I would've thought the majority of people understand the definition of credibility in this instance thanks, and you know full well it has nothing to do with 'military capability'. I think you'll find a pretty high percentage of locals who would agree with me that East Dulwich deserves a 'more' credible mag than what we have at present.

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Dog duck Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > > > I don't recall saying that there should'nt be > > local advertising or sponsored pages or > features? > > I do understand how a magazine can function > > including printing and distribution. I also > > understand that SE22 contains bits of useful > > information, but it's look and feel is > inadequate > > at best. With regards to editing, I guess we > can > > all have our own opinions on that subject. What > > has the organisation of the Goose Green Fair > got > > to do with anything? > > xxxxxxx > > You called SE22 "an ad mag". > > I think that is an unfair description. It contains > a lot of useful information, including about > upcoming events, new shops and businesses, and > photos of past local events, plus articles by > local people. > > To say "its look and feel is inadequate at best" > depends entirely on what you feel is "adequate", > which is a matter of personal opinion (though I > agree the layout could be improved in places). > > To imply (as you do in your subject header) that > it is not "credible" just because you want a > magazine with a different focus and contents is > unfair. > > My reference to the Goose Green Fair was because > Angela Burgess, who edits the magagazine, lives > locally and contributes a lot to the local > community. She does not just sit and haul in ads > to put in SE22. Why are you going on about what great things Angela Burgess does in the local community? I've got no issue with that, I'm saying SE22 mag is pap!. It's structure and layout is rubbish and the photography is laughable. As you state you 'flinch' when walking past crappy local architecture, I flinch when a copy of SE22 drops on my doormat.

I do like a diphthong on a Friday...

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > The SE22 magazine has a great deal of useful > information in it, and Angela does a great job not > just of editing the magazine but of co-ordinating > the very successful annual Dulwich Festival Fair > on Goose Green (for which so far as I know she > does not get paid). > > Dog Duck, you say you are looking to produce a > magazine that is "properly designed, properly > written with engaging features, creative > photography, illustration, profiles, general local > interests and a thought provoking read." > > Ok - great idea. How do you intend to finance its > production and distribution unless you have paid > advertising? > > And what's wrong with local businesses advertising > in a local magazine, anyway? Seems like a good > thing to me. > > Or do you intend to make people pay for your mag? > Good luck with that. I don't recall saying that there should'nt be local advertising or sponsored pages or features? I do understand how a magazine can function including printing and distribution. I also understand that SE22 contains bits of useful information, but it's look and feel is inadequate at best. With regards to editing, I guess we can all have our own opinions on that subject. What has the organisation of the Goose Green Fair got to do with anything?

Curmudgeon Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > SE22 is an ad mag though It's not a magazine. A magazine by it's very name is or should be a explosion of ideas and information...

DulwichFox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We already have a Credible Mag.. SE22 Angela > Burgess. Editor. > > http://www.arounddulwich.co.uk / > http://www.semagazines.co.uk > > Foxy Eh? What?

Sue Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > What isn't "credible" about what we've got at the > moment? > > I'm bemused. Don't be 'bemused'. I'm talking about a publication that is properly designed, properly written with engaging features, creative photography, illustration, profiles, general local interests and a thought provoking read. Do please tell me where I should be looking to get all of these?

What do you think about the idea?

Thank you, very good, great video... If it aint baroque, don't fix it!